…..............................................................................................22 Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, No. 04 CIV 10014 PKL, 2009 WL 3111766 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2009)........................................................................................14 <…
…DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc., 121 F.3d 818 (2d Cir. 1997) ...................................................................................................... 4 E*Trade Fin. Corp. v. Deutsche Bank AG, 582 F. Supp. 2d 528 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) .......................................................................…
…under the protective order are not mooted by the settlement of the underlying action. See Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 140-41 (2d Cir. 2004). Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit…
…2012)....................................... 16 Diversified Grp., Inc. v. Daugerdas, 217 F.R.D. 152 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) ...................................................................................... 11 Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2004)...............................................…
…particular materials under the protective order are not mooted by the settlement of the underlying action. See Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 140-41 (2d Cir. 2004). Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332…
…2007) .............................................................................................. 22 Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, No. 04 CIV 10014 PKL, 2009 WL 3111766 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2009) ........................................................................................ 1…
…Preska July 29, 2020 Page 2 courts have recognized, temporary stays of unseal orders are appropriate so that “[t]he genie is [not] out of the bottle,” Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 144 (2d Cir. 2004)…
…..............................................................................................22 Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, No. 04 CIV 10014 PKL, 2009 WL 3111766 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2009)........................................................................................14 <…
…of particular materials under the protective order are not mooted by the settlement of the tmderlying action. See Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133 , 140-41 (2d Cir. 2004). Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document…
…States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1047 (2d Cir. 1995) (Amodeo II); Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 144 (2d Cir. 2004). And where those documents Ms. Maxwell seeks to keep shielded were already unsealed, the…
…More recently, the Second Circuit again reiterated “that court reliance is not the test” of whether a document qualifies as a judicial document. Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG, 940 F.3d 146, 152 (2d Cir. 2019). These holdings align with…
…though the parties in those cases had agreed to protective orders or confidentiality provisions. See, e.g., Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 143 (2d Cir. 2004) (unsealing judicial document despite party’s claim that it had…
…the plaintiff, not a third-party, moved to modify the order for a separate third-party in another case. In Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2004), the court sua sponte publicly disclosed settlement terms…
…ensure receipt, so that notice will be provided to the recipient, and enforcement of the subpoena will be consistent with the requirements of due process.’” Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, 262 F.R.D. 293, 304…
…provisions. See, e.g., Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 143 (2d Cir. 2004) (unsealing judicial document despite party’s claim that it had settled claim to “avoid public disclosure at trial of the temporarily sealed documents”)…
…ensure receipt, so that notice will be provided to the recipient, and enforcement of the subpoena will be consistent with the requirements of due process.’” Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, 262 F.R.D. 293, 304…
…1995)). Courts “engage in a balancing test to determine whether undue burden exists.” Usov, 2014 WL 4354691, *16 (citing Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, 262 F.R.D. 293, 299–300 (S.D.N.Y. 2009…
…ensure receipt, so that notice will be provided to the recipient, and enforcement of the subpoena will be consistent with the requirements of due process.’” Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, 262 F.R.D. 293, 304…
…though the parties in those cases had agreed to protective orders or confidentiality provisions. See, e.g., Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 143 (2d Cir. 2004) (unsealing judicial document despite a party’s claim that it…
…unseal on grounds that such documents are “judicial documents,” even if evidence that was subject of motion in limine was not ultimately introduced at trial); MacroMavens, LLC v. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., 2011 WL 1796138 (S.D.N.Y. Apr…
Comments