gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.24.3.pdf PDF
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 24-3 Filed 12/17/15 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 24-3 Filed 12/17/15 Page 2 of 3 Express. Home of…
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 24-3 Filed 12/17/15 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 24-3 Filed 12/17/15 Page 2 of 3 Express. Home of…
… (Dkt. no. 1254.) This Court expressly ordered that lines 217:17-19 of the deposition transcript should remain under seal because they contained a mistaken transcription, and the answer transcribed was not the answer actually given. Counsel shall re-file…
…proceed with a VI deposition and to accept service for that deposition. I understand the issue expressed below and will prgmptly communicate with Ms Maxwell's counsel in order to determine her position. Thanks, Marty From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Thursday…
…Gow, quoted in the Express. 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 24 Filed 12/17/15 Page 2 of 4 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. /s/ Sigrid S. McCawley…
…privacy merely because they have played a role in a civil or criminal case against perpetrators. As an initial matter, Intervenors seek to unseal documents concerning the alleged sexual abuse of minors over the express wishes of those victims. Yet…
…1. 12. Attached hereto as Sealed Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of January 22, 2015 Dailymail.co article “All aboard The Lolita Express’: Flight Logs. 13. Attached hereto as Sealed Exhibit 11 is a true and correct…
…1. 12. Attached hereto as Sealed Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of January 22, 2015 Dailymail.co article “All aboard The Lolita Express’: Flight Logs. 13. Attached hereto as Sealed Exhibit 11 is a true and correct…
…50). But we agree. It would be legal error for a court to conclude that a given filing is non-judicial merely because the court did not expressly rely on that filing “in adjudicating a motion.” But, of course, that…
…Maxwell defendants, take no 14 position on our application. Judge Koeltl has expressed a 15 willingness to consider the information that we are seeking by 16 way of this modification. 17 THE COURT: Incidentally, as I understand it, what we…
…the Second Circuit, we believe her participation and the participation of other third parties whose privacy interests are implicated are appropriate. Ms. Campbell expressed interest in participating in the post-remand proceedings, and does not oppose adjournment of the conference.
…with Virginia Giuffre’s letter in response (Dkt. 1194). While Ms. Maxwell begins her letter by expressing privacy concerns over the soon-to-be- released portion of her transcript, it is clear her real concern, expressed on the second page…
…than an answer to an interrogatory. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 33(c) (expressly authorizing the use of interrogatories at trial to extent permitted by the law of evidence). A response which is nothing more than a cross-reference by…
…and fundamental rights. Ms. Maxwell requests a pre-trial hearing on this issue and that the Court issues a ruling that the opinions expressed in Exhibit A are inadmissible at trial for the above stated reasons. Dated: January 5, 2017 …
…must be excluded. Ms. Maxwell requests a pre-trial hearing on this issue and that the Court issues a ruling that the opinions expressed in Exhibit A are inadmissible at trial for the above stated reasons. Dated: January 5, 2017 …
…than an answer to an interrogatory. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 33(c) (expressly authorizing the use of interrogatories at trial to extent permitted by the law of evidence). A response which is nothing more than a cross-reference by…
…This Court has received at least one email from a non-party’s counsel expressing dissatisfaction with the previous redactions because there were descriptions of conduct that would allow the identity of the given non- party to be surmised by…
…71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995) (“Amodeo II”)). The Brown court expressly acknowledged the right of an accused as a “countervailing interest” worthy of overcoming any presumption of access. Id.at 47 n. 13. (“Examples of such countervailing…
…parte submissions. If this Court, in fact, permits the Non-Party Does to express their privacy concerns on an ex parte basis to avoid making additional harmful disclosures to the adverse parties, intervenors, and other potential bad actors, then Doe…
…make objections to, and timely seek the Court’s resolution of, confidentiality designations). 2. Language of the Protective Order Courts next look to the express language of the protective order. See In re Ethylene, 255 F.R.D. at 320…
…r private parties." Id. New York cour ts have pointed out that t h e legislat ure's express purpose in passing the Shield Law was " to avoid 'problematic incursions into the integrity of the ed i torial process.'" In…
Comments