…competing proposals for streamlining the unsealing process established by the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions. See DE 1224. We write to express our views regarding the parties’ respective submissions, as well as that offered by the Miami Herald…
… (Dkt. no. 1254.) This Court expressly ordered that lines 217:17-19 of the deposition transcript should remain under seal because they contained a mistaken transcription, and the answer transcribed was not the answer actually given. Counsel shall re-file…
…privacy merely because they have played a role in a civil or criminal case against perpetrators. As an initial matter, Intervenors seek to unseal documents concerning the alleged sexual abuse of minors over the express wishes of those victims. Yet…
…process. At the July 26 meet and confer, Maxwell’s counsel expressed that they would be unable to carry out the Court’s suggestion due to scheduling conflicts until January of next year, and asserted 1 The Non-Party Objectors…
…with Virginia Giuffre’s letter in response (Dkt. 1194). While Ms. Maxwell begins her letter by expressing privacy concerns over the soon-to-be- released portion of her transcript, it is clear her real concern, expressed on the second page…
…71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995) (“Amodeo II”)). The Brown court expressly acknowledged the right of an accused as a “countervailing interest” worthy of overcoming any presumption of access. Id.at 47 n. 13. (“Examples of such countervailing…
…Order. For example, Doe # 84 is an individual who testified at a deposition, represented by counsel, under the express promise of confidentiality under the Protective Order. This individual accused Mr. Epstein of wrongdoing perpetrated when the individual was minor. During…
…For example, Doe #84 did not receive notice and it is uncontested that Doe #84 testified only under the express promise of confidentiality. The Second Circuit sua sponte redacted Doe #84’s name from summary judgment pleadings finding that Doe…
…inducing parties to provide discovery in a contentious litigation.’” (DE 1113 at 5) Does 1 and 2 wrote this Court and expressed their desire to not have their names released. (DE 1125) Although they did not thereafter submit any objection…
…Again, the parties and any relevant Does should have the chance to express their views before this Court exercises its discretion. Herald’s Position: The Herald agrees with Plaintiff’s position. 3. Does’ Sealing Motions Plaintiff’s Position: Plaintiff agrees…
…Plaintiff claimed she had been forcibly sexually assaulted by her friends. Plaintiff’s claim of forced sexual assault was expressly refuted by the witnesses, who also verified Plaintiff’s attempt to get out of trouble by offering to have sex…
…to these judicial documents. The publication of Maxwell’s deposition testimony is in the public interest. Maxwell’s brief concedes (as it must) that the public has expressed a strong interest in reviewing these materials, especially her deposition testimony. Maxwell…
…interests against the public’s right of access. The Court will conduct a particularized review of the sealed materials and weigh the competing interests regardless whether it receives any Non-Party Objection. 4. Unless expressly stated otherwise, all notices, submissions…
…interests against the public’s right of access. The Court will conduct a particularized review of the sealed materials and weigh the competing interests regardless whether it receives any Non-Party Objection. 4. Unless expressly stated otherwise, all notices, submissions…
…interests against the public’s right of access. The Court will conduct a particularized review of the Sealed Materials and weigh the competing interests regardless whether it receives any Non-Party Objection. 4. Unless expressly stated otherwise, all notices, submissions…
…interests against the public’s right of access. The Court will conduct a particularized review of the Sealed Materials and weigh the competing interests regardless whether it receives any Non-Party Objection. 4. Unless expressly stated otherwise, all notices, submissions…
…interests against the public’s right of access. The Court will conduct a particularized review of the sealed materials and weigh the competing interests regardless whether it receives any Non-Party Objection. 4. Unless expressly stated otherwise, all notices, submissions…
…enters the public record. Brown, 929 F.3d at 47 (internal quotation omitted). The media coverage over the course of the previous weeks bears out – powerfully – the concerns expressed by the Court of Appeals. A review of media reporting from…
…interests against the public’s right of access. The Court will conduct a particularized review of the Sealed Materials and weigh the competing interests regardless whether it receives any Non-Party Objection. 4. Unless expressly stated otherwise, all notices, submissions…
…and has specifically expressed concern for its ongoing efficacy . The Second Circuit has been hesitant to permit modifications that might "unfairly disturb the legitimate 2 The argument with respect to the summary judgment was held in open court without objection…
Comments