…governmental litigants) and mundane (Plaintiff completely refused to answer interrogatories, even though they comply with the Federal and Local Rules). Because of the breadth of the issues raised, Defendant’s obligations in fully and fairly responding to Plaintiff’s intransigence…
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…58) all!n* 59) dersh* 60) law.harvard.edu * 61) alandersh* Jane Doe 2 73) lago* 74) clinton* 75) BC 76) HC 77) HRC 78) police* 79) cop* 80) fbi* 81) federal* w/3 bur* 82) bur* w/8 inves!…
…cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ________________________________/ PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION AND DEFENDANT’S INTERROGATORIES, PLAINTIFF’S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT’S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26…
…07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ______________________________/ NON-REDACTED DECLARATION OF SIGRID S. McCAWLEY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCEED PRESUMPTIVE TEN DEPOSITION LIMIT IN FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 30(A)(2)(a)(ii), FILED UNDER SEAL I…
…SERVICE OF RlTT~E 45 SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMAT[ON, OR OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PRE.MISES UPO)l JEAN LUC BRUNEL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, pursuantto Rule 45 oftbc .Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff, Virginia Giuffre…
…Preska, for an order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 granting the USVI’s motion to intervene and for confidential access to judicial records and discovery documents. The grounds for this motion are set forth in the accompanying…
… IT APPEARING that the Unitl,d States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have concluded their own investigation into Epstein's background and any offtme1 that may have been committed by Epstein against the United States from…
…24 Page 2 of 7 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (“Ms. Maxwell”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53, files this Motion to Appoint a Special Master to Preside over the Third Deposition of Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and states as follows: …
…ASSOCIATED SANCTIONS Petitioner, Virginia Giuffre, pursuant to Rule 45(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 83.6, by and through her undersigned counsel, respectfully moves this Court to issue an order finding of civil contempt…
…Giuffre's Reply in support of her Motion to Exceed Presumptive Ten Deposition Limit in Federal Rule Civil Procedure 30(A)(2)(a)(ii) and certain accompanying exhibits under seal pursuant to this Comi's Protective Order (DE 62). The…
… ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................11 I. PROFESSOR DERSHOWITZ SHOULD BE PERMITTE…
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…A. Jeffrey Epstein and Ronald Rizzo Are Not Unavailable Plaintiff cannot claim that Jeffery Epstein and Ronald Rizzo are “unavailable witnesses” whose testimony can be presented by deposition at trial under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…
…Motion for Sanctions (“Sur-Reply”), stating as follows: INTRODUCTION Plaintiff’s Response and Sur-Reply are founded entirely on a miscomprehension of the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 33. She strenuously argues that she has “disclosed…
…07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ______________________________/ NON-REDACTED DECLARATION OF SIGRID S. McCAWLEY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCEED PRESUMPTIVE TEN DEPOSITION LIMIT IN FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 30(A)(2)(a)(ii), FILED UNDER SEAL I…
…the Honorable Robert W. Sweet, for an order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Civil Rule 56.1, granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the Complaint filed on September 21, 2015 in its…
…Deposition Questions Filed Under Seal (Doc. # 143 ) (“Motion” ). Ms. Maxwell, pursuant to Rule 30(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, moves to prohibit Plaintiff from asking her questions about any adult, In support of her requests, Ms…
Comments