…that subpart. Ms. Giuffre is not aware of what health insurance carrier or other organization paid for her historical medical expenses unless it is identified on the records produced to the Defendant. Subpart (h) is an inappropriate interrogatory; however, for…
…That test “asks both whether the documents have historically been open to the press and general public and whether public access plays a significant positive role in the functioning of the particular process in question.” Id. 18 Dershowitz’s motion…
…proceedings and documents, and asks “both whether the documents have historically been open to the press and general public and whether public access plays a significant positive role in the functioning of the particular process in question.” Lugosch, 435 F…
…the Second Circuit considers “(a) whether the documents have historically been open to the press and general public (experience) and (b) whether public access plays a significant positive role in the 15 functioning of the particular process in question (logic…
…is whether intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the parties whose lawsuits are being 'invaded.’”). Several other factors historically serve as guardrails for the Court’s discretion in permitting intervention under Rule 24(b)…
…the Second Circuit considers “(a) whether the documents have historically been open to the press and general public (experience) and (b) whether public access plays a significant positive role in the 15 functioning of the particular process in question (logic…
…test, a court evaluates whether the documents are those that "have historically been open to the press and general public" and for which "public access plays a significant positive role in the functioning of the particular process in question." Id…
…the presumption of public filing that finds its twin sources in the common-law right of public access to judicial documents and the qualified First Amendment right to attend judicial proceedings. The two are entirely complementary."). Historically, at common law…
…the Second Circuit considers “(a) whether the documents have historically been open to the press and general public (experience) and (b) whether public access plays a significant positive role in the 15 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document…
…S.D.N.Y.1981)). As the Supreme Court has made clear: The application of claim and issue preclusion to nonparties thus runs up against the “deep-rooted historic tradition that everyone should have his own day in court.” Richards…
…issue. For example, the scheduling of Ms. Maxwell’s deposition (which depended, among other things, on an historic snowstorm, a disputed protective order, Plaintiff’s failure to timely produce documents, and counsel’s conflicting calendars, all of which have been…
…issue. For example, the scheduling of Ms. Maxwell’s deposition (which depended, among other things, on an historic snowstorm, a disputed protective order, Plaintiff’s failure to timely produce documents, and counsel’s conflicting calendars, all of which have been…
…issue. For example, the scheduling of Ms. Maxwell 's deposition (which depended, among other things, on an historic snowsto1m, a disputed protective order, Plaintiffs failure to timely produce documents, and counsel 's conflicting calendars, all of which have been amply…