gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.156.1.pdf PDF
…Edwards and Cassell re attorney defense/commo 1 2/12/2015 6:14 Virginia Giuffre [email protected] impressions and legal advice relating to deposition testimony n interest Withheld 3 msg …
…Edwards and Cassell re attorney defense/commo 1 2/12/2015 6:14 Virginia Giuffre [email protected] impressions and legal advice relating to deposition testimony n interest Withheld 3 msg …
…Edwards and Cassell re attorney defense/commo 1 2/12/2015 6:14 Virginia Giuffre [email protected] impressions and legal advice relating to deposition testimony n interest Withheld 3 msg …
…Edwards and Cassell re attorney defense/commo 1 2/12/2015 6:14 Virginia Giuffre [email protected] impressions and legal advice relating to deposition testimony n interest Withheld 3 msg …
…Work Product/joint 2/16/2015 [email protected],robiej defense/common 2 1:05 [email protected] [email protected] Discussion of evidence among client and attorneys interest Wit…
…Edwards and Cassell re attorney defense/commo 1 2/12/2015 6:14 Virginia Giuffre [email protected] impressions and legal advice relating to deposition testimony n interest Withheld 3 msg …
…28/2015 Email with Giuffre, McCawley, Edwards and defense/common 19 17:47 Virginia Giuffre [email protected] Henderson re discussion of draft statement interest Withheld 3 msg …
…with Giuffre, Edwards, Pottinger and interest/work 30 18:40 Stan [email protected] McCawley re legal advice related to VRS product Withheld 1 msg …
…McCawley and legal assistant re seeking Work Product/joint 5/4/2015 information to assist in providing legal advice, with defense/common 81 20:04 Virginia Giuffre [email protected] attachment …
…task. As the Court’s opinion recognizes in connection with the remaining sealed materials, the district court is better positioned to communicate with the parties and any nonparties whose privacy interests might be affected by unsealing. On that score, it…
…task. As the Court’s opinion recognizes in connection with the remaining sealed materials, the district court is better positioned to communicate with the parties and any nonparties whose privacy interests might be affected by unsealing. On that score, it…
…and Ms. Maxwell’s privacy interests. Further complicating the review are the numerous and varied legal grounds for sealing and redacting non-judicial and judicial documents. Two general grounds exist. A document may be sealed if it is a non…
…15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1196 Filed 01/27/21 Page 3 of 32 3 1 materials; (2) identify and evaluate the weight of any 2 countervailing interests; and (3) determine whether the 3 countervailing interests rebut the presumption. 4 …
…no. 1321 at 2.) Second, even so, the privacy interests at stake outweigh any presumption of public access to the Document. The public does not have an absolute right to access and inspect court documents; rather, courts may exercise their…
…one, evaluate the 22 weight of the presumption of public access to the materials; 23 and two, identify and evaluate the weight of any countervailing 24 interests; and 3, determine whether the countervailing 25 interests rebut the presumption. The presumption…
…. . the respondents did not assert any other interest whose weight may compete with the weight of the presumption given to the public’s right of access to judicial documents.”). 1 More to the point, what minimal support Thomas could offer…
…Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 47 n.13 (2d Cir. 2019) (noting that it is the “privacy interest of those who resist disclose” that serve as a countervailing interest) (quoting S.E.C. v. TheStreet.Com, 273 F…
…15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1284 Filed 12/02/22 Page 3 of 17 3 1 materials; (2) identify and evaluate the weight of any 2 countervailing interests; and (3) determine whether the 3 countervailing interests rebut the presumption. 4 …
…15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1283 Filed 12/02/22 Page 3 of 17 3 1 materials; (2) identify and evaluate the weight of any 2 countervailing interests; and (3) determine whether the 3 countervailing interests rebut the presumption. 4 …
…2019) (“Examples of such countervailing values may include, depending on the circumstances, . . . ‘the privacy interest of those who resist disclosure.’”) (quoting SEC v. TheStreet.Com, 273 F.3d 222, 232 (2d Cir. 2001)). That Ms. Maxwell “resist[ed] disclosure” of…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
Comments