gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.140.3.pdf PDF
…Document 140-3 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 140-3 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 4 § 42:178.Public-interest privilege, 7 Carmody-Wait 2d …
…Document 140-3 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 140-3 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 4 § 42:178.Public-interest privilege, 7 Carmody-Wait 2d …
…140-2 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 2 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 140-2 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 3 § 23:38.”Public interest” privilege, 1 Modern New York Discovery …
…Maxwell’s motion is denied. I. Legal Standard “A motion for reconsideration is an extraordinary remedy to be employed sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of scarce judicial resources.” Drapkin v. Mafco 1 (Letter from Laura Menninger (“Mot.”)…
…protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work-product doctrine, the common interest privilege or any other applicable privilege. Subject to and without waiving the above objections, Maxwell is withholding documents outside of the Relevant Periods described in paragraph15, supra…
…12 B. There Is No Risk of Undue Delay or Prejudice .........................................12 C. Professor Dershowitz Has a Compelling Interest in Access That Is Not Represented by Any Existing Party ........................................1…
…pursuant to the Court’s Order [DE 134] dated May 2, 2016.1 ARGUMENT Statements made by witnesses to law enforcement are protected by the public interest privilege, which “exists to encourage witnesses to come forward and provide information in…
…May 3rd, please provide the following documents on or before April 27th, 2016. All documents withheld on the basis of the “public interest privilege,” other than Plaintiff’s actual statements to any law enforcement agency, which are to be…
…Parties. First, Doe criticizes the Original Parties’ compliance with the Court’s unsealing orders and directives to redact the names of non-parties whose interests the Court has not yet considered, which has involved an immense amount of resources. ECF…
…to Disclose Individuals Whom Defendant Disseminated Confidential Information 422: Defendant’s Motion to Compel Settlement Agreement Addressing these motions as to these four Non-Parties expedites the Court’s review of documents in which the public has an interest…
…the relevant non- party may submit to the Court an “objection” to unsealing which “[states] briefly the reasons for the objection” and “[identifies] any countervailing interest that militates against unsealing.” 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1125…
…A hereto (USVI’s operative First Amended Complaint, filed February 11, 2020). Access to other judicial documents in this action has already been granted to intervening private parties in interest, see Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir…
…as she poses to promote body positivity …
…s identity, failing to “include a ‘particularized’ or ‘individualized’ review” of materials to balance the public’s interest in monitoring federal courts’ exercise of their powers against “countervailing private interests,” and “failing to consider international comity.” Doe 171 Br. at…
…unsealed in Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019), and that her interests outweigh the public’s interests. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on…
…6 reply, that's fine, we will adopt that. 7 With respect to paragraph 3(e), that paragraph will 8 remain in the interest of access and transparency. The upshot 9 of that, as you all know, is that the…
…public interest privilege, and any other applicable privilege. 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1328-5 Filed 01/05/24 Page 3 of 45 This document is CONFIDENTIAL under the Court’s Protective Order (DE 62) Ms…
…Risk of Undue Delay or Prejudice .........................................12 C. Professor Dershowitz Has a Compelling Interest in Access That Is Not Represented by Any Existing Party ........................................13 II. THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND TH…
…concerns about annoyance or embarrassment are insufficient to overcome the presumption of public access to judicial documents in a case of great public interest like this one.2 This is especially so when many of the facts underlying this case…
…no. 1321 at 2.) Second, even so, the privacy interests at stake outweigh any presumption of public access to the Document. The public does not have an absolute right to access and inspect court documents; rather, courts may exercise their…
…one, evaluate the 22 weight of the presumption of public access to the materials; 23 and two, identify and evaluate the weight of any countervailing 24 interests; and 3, determine whether the countervailing 25 interests rebut the presumption. The presumption…
Comments