…his deposition. Epstein, however, appears to have no interest in answering questions under oath about the scope of his sex trafficking organization and he has not authorized his lawyer to accept service of the subpoena. On March 7, 2016, Ms…
…information protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work-product doctrine, Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, any common interest privilege, joint defense agreement or any other applicable privilege. 4. Ms. Maxwell objects to the Requests to the…
…opinion, the Second Circuit suggested in dicta that “[t]he District Court may also order the parties to identify and notify additional parties whose privacy interests would likely be 1 Based on lessons learned from past rounds of unsealing, the…
…his deposition. Epstein, however, appears to have no interest in answering questions under oath about the scope of his sex trafficking organization and he has not authorized his lawyer to accept service of the subpoena. On March 7, 2016, Ms…
…information protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work-product doctrine, Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, any common interest privilege, joint defense agreement or any other applicable privilege. 4. Ms. Maxwell objects to the Requests to the…
…his deposition. Epstein, however, appears to have no interest in answering questions under oath about the scope of his sex trafficking organization and he has not authorized his lawyer to accept service of the subpoena. On March 7, 2016, Ms…
…life and finances from 2015 to present, including all documents “related to” her: tax returns, W-2 or any other source of income statements for her or any entity in which she holds an interest; Id. at RFP 23…
…life and finances from 2015 to present, including all documents “related to” her: tax returns, W-2 or any other source of income statements for her or any entity in which she holds an interest; Id. at RFP 23…
…information protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work-product doctrine, Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, any common interest privilege, joint defense agreement or any other applicable privilege. 4. Ms. Maxwell objects to the Requests to the…
…should also find that Ms. Maxwell and J. Doe have failed to identify any non-generalized, non-speculative interest that would outweigh these First Amendment and common law rights of access. Therefore, the remaining documents should be immediately unsealed with…
…aff’d, 814 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 2016) (disclosing docket sheets after finding there are no “compelling private interests favoring sealing”). Where a presumption of the highest weight exists, “[t]he Court is required to order disclosure absent compelling…
…aff’d, 814 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 2016) (disclosing docket sheets after finding there are no “compelling private interests favoring sealing”). Where a presumption of the highest weight exists, “[t]he Court is required to order disclosure absent compelling…
…of privilege, the work product doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. Ransome further objects to this Request in that it is vague and ambiguous with respect to its reference to “all documents” containing communications. Ransome…
…of privilege, the work product doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. Ransome further objects to this Request in that it is vague and ambiguous with respect to its reference to “all documents” containing communications. Ransome…
…of privilege, the work product doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. Ransome further objects to this Request in that it is vague and ambiguous with respect to its reference to “all documents” containing communications. Ransome…
…any Lender or Investor for the past three years by You personally or on Your behalf or on behalf of any entity in which You hold or held a controlling interest from January 2015 to the Present. DOCUMENT REQUEST NO…
Comments