…1077) that the parties redact from those pleadings to be unsealed three categories: 1) “personal identifying information as to any person mentioned in the documents,” 2) “the names of nonparties other than Does 1 and 2,” and 3) “other portions…
…that “personal identifying information as to any person mentioned in the documents and the names of nonparties other than Does 1 and 2 and other portions related to such nonparties’ specific conduct will be redacted from the materials being unsealed…
…in support of an Original Party’s objections to unsealing. The parties have been unable to reach agreement on the following proposals: First, Plaintiff proposed reviewing the remaining set of motions that mention Doe 1 or Doe 2: 231, 279…
…5 As with the last round of unsealed materials, the 6 documents at issue here, unless otherwise mentioned, were 7 submitted in connection with discovery motions decided by Judge 8 Sweet. The parties and nonparties dispute whether certain of 9…
…redactions be narrowly tailored to address the countervailing interests Doe 54 raised. II. Does 55 and 56 Have Not Rebutted the Presumption in Favor of Public Access. Does 55 and 56 are mentioned in Docket Entries 204-2, 212-2…
…who have not filed 15 objections. 16 We are now still in the first phase. As I mentioned, 17 upon consideration today are the objections of the second set 18 of aid of the 16 nonparty objectors: Does 12, 28…
…who have not filed 15 objections. 16 We are now still in the first phase. As I mentioned, 17 upon consideration today are the objections of the second set 18 of aid of the 16 nonparty objectors: Does 12, 28…
…never “testified that Defendant procured underage girls for Epstein.” (Reply at 4) To the contrary, he testified that all of the underage girls he interviewed never mentioned Ms. Maxwell at all. These are but a few of the misrepresentations of…
…never “testified that Defendant procured underage girls for Epstein.” (Reply at 4) To the contrary, he testified that all of the underage girls he interviewed never mentioned Ms. Maxwell at all. These are but a few of the misrepresentations of…
…a requirement, however, and in the intervening years courts in this District have presided over numerous Epstein-related cases and handled sealing (and unsealing) motions without soliciting objections from third parties who were mentioned in the documents. See, e.g…
…Certified Realtime 7 A Hi. 8 Reporter and Notary Public within Colorado. 8 Q As we mentioned off the record, my name is 9 9 Laura Menninger -- ******* 10 …
…Except as to Documents Describing Sexual Abuse. Doe 28 is mentioned in 25 documents.3 The totality of Doe 28’s objection is that unsealing of the materials at issue “would be detrimental to [Doe 28’s] wellbeing as [they…
…The Court Should Unseal Portions of Docket Entries the Second Circuit Already Released. .................................................................................................................................... 6 III. The Court Should Unseal Portions of Documents Mentioning Doe 1 and Doe 2. ... 6 IV. …
…Clinton were included in her initial Rule 26 disclosures served on November 11, 2015 and two of the six were specifically mentioned in Plaintiff’s Complaint. Finally, the fact that witness Rinaldo Rizzo had a deposition re-scheduled from April…
…There are a few groups of people, his office in New York and I guess -- *** Q. Okay. The other people mentioned as co-conspirators are Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, and Nadia Marcinkova. So we'll get to them in a…
…That is prejudicial. It is Defendant who has behaved improperly in repeated depositions, and Plaintiff should not be required to pay for a special master. A final point needs to be mentioned. As recounted in the background section above, the …
…heard on reliance? 4 All right. The next question I have is: How are we 5 to protect the interests of the nonparties or third parties who 6 either produced materials or were mentioned in the materials? 7 MR. COOPER:…
…Giuffre is copied on the message. Ms. Churcher mentions Professor Dershowitz as one of Epstein’s lawyers, together with Kenneth Starr, but not as an abuser: Hi Jarred Hopefully you have Virginia' s book pitch by now. She has some…
…re referring to. 3 "Q. So was there -- during your time, was there no other -- 4 you mentioned information on a computer. Was there any 5 hard-copy document you would refer to to find someone's number? 6 "A…
…trauma and did not want to be involved in the proceedings at all. Doe #84’s name was mentioned in some of the sealed summary judgment pleadings, and the Second Circuit sua sponte redacted the name and the deposition testimony…
Comments