…the July 3, 2019 Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit directed this Court to perform a “particularized review” of materials previously filed under seal in this matter (the “Sealed Materials”) to determine whether they…
…filed under seal in relation to Defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment. Dershowitz relies upon and incorporates by reference his previous submissions in support of his motion to unseal certain documents in this case (see ECF Nos. 362-64…
…Defendant. Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a…
…the Government respectfully moves to unseal—in a limited fashion—various materials previously produced by the law firm of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to the Government pursuant to a Grand Jury subpoena (the “Materials”) during the grand jury investigation of…
…Defendant. Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a…
…Edwards, Defendant's motions in limine, and Plaintiff's motions in limine, previously scheduled for February 2, and the argument for Defendant's motion for summary judgment, previously scheduled for February 9, shall instead be heard at noon on Thursday…
…MOTIONS Giuffre v. Maxwell, 15‐cv‐07433 Pursuant to Order of October 28, 2019, Paragraph 1 DOCKET DATE RELATED RESOLVED RESOLVED PREVIOUSLY MOTION …
…27__, 20202021) The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order…
…Defendant. Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a…
…Defendant. Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a…
…| Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS Dear Judge Sweet: Movant-Intervenor Michael Cernovich d/b/a Cernovich Media was previously unable to divine from the publicly available portions of Plaintiff’s Notice of Intent to Request Redaction (Doc No…
…27, 2020) The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order…
…and could result in some unfortunate association between the non-parties and Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. But as the Court has previously recognized, such generalized concerns about annoyance or embarrassment are insufficient to overcome the presumption of public access…
… What, if anything, were they in 4 response to? 5 Your Honor has found in previous cases, such as 6 Hawkins v. City of New York, that the failure to identify the 7 individuals to whom the statement allegedly was…
…519 F.3d 1123 (10th Cir. 2008) (arguing for opportunity for victim to deliver a victim impact statement). His previous experience will be valuable to Ms. Giuffre as this case proceeds. Professor Cassell is also located in Salt Lake City…
…A. Ms. Maxwell incorporates by reference the Countervailing Interests she previously briefed and the legal bases therefore. See DE 1057.1 The Second Circuit already determined that Ms. Maxwell’s July 2016 deposition was compelled and that her answers related…
…dated Mar. 17, 2016 [dkt. no. 62].) As previously observed by the Court, that protective order is “unremarkable in form and function” in that it, like most protective orders, seeks to “protect the discovery and dissemination of confidential information or…
…Page 2 of 6 Page 2 of 6 Doe’s letter in opposition to the Joint Letter submitted to the Court by the parties in Dershowitz rehashes the arguments he has made previously regarding the unsealing of documents in Maxwell…
…they repackage the same request, the Dershowitz parties are singularly ill-suited to guarding Maxwell non-party privacy interests. The Court should – indeed, for the reasons set forth previously by Your Honor, must – deny Mr. Dershowitz’s present proposal to…
…maybe I would 21 recognize it, but I don't believe I'd 22 remember him. 23 Q. Did you ever go to the Dubin 24 residence with some woman who had previously 25 been with Mr. Epstein? Confidential…
Comments