…to why certain portions of her deposition are “personal,” “most of the cases in which courts have concluded that the privacy interests of individuals were sufficient to overcome the presumption of access involve illness or sensitive personal financial information.” Lytle…
…monitoring the federal courts.” Amodeo II, 71 F.3d at 1049. The common law right must be weighed against countervailing interests favoring privacy, namely: (1) the need for public access to the documents at issue; (2) the extent of previous…
…loss of standing in the community, loss of dignity, and invasion of privacy in her public and private life not less than $30,000,000.00”; and (C) Estimated lost income of $180,000 annually. Present value $3,461,000…
…sexual harassment and retaliation, where complaint sought punitive damages, deposition evidence indicated that employer may have acted in reckless disregard of female employees' federal rights, and privacy concerns could be addressed with protective order); Grosek v. Panther Transp., Inc.…
…loss of standing in the community, loss of dignity, and invasion of privacy in her public and private life not less than $30,000,000.00”; and (C) Estimated lost income of $180,000 annually. Present value $3,461,000…
…loss of standing in the community, loss of dignity, and invasion of privacy in her public and private life not less than $30,000,000.00”; and (C) Estimated lost income of $180,000 annually. Present value $3,461,000…
…which was between Edwards and Cassell on the one hand, and Dershowitz on the other. But because certain collateral issues concerning her privacy were at stake, Ms. Giuffre’s attorney (Ms. Sigrid McCawley) was allowed to attend the depositions. The…
…loss of standing in the community, loss of dignity, and invasion of privacy in her public and private life not less than $30,000,000.00”; and (C) Estimated lost income of $180,000 annually. Present value $3,461,000…
Comments