…of any Sealed Materials. The solicitation and receipt of objections from Non-Parties who wish to participate is intended merely to aid the Court in balancing privacy and other interests against the public’s right of access. The Court will…
…20 Page 3 of 22 her counsel agreed, would be honored subject to the few very limited situations in which the public right to access the court files overcomes the privacy interests at stake. ARGUMENT I. Weight of Presumption Each…
…she does not wish to further address those objections. See Dkt. 1230 at 2. Each of the listed Does has counsel who have ably asserted their own respective privacy rights. Ms. Maxwell therefore leaves it to this Court to conduct…
…Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 47 n.13 (2d Cir. 2019) (noting that it is the “privacy interest of those who resist disclose” that serve as a countervailing interest) (quoting S.E.C. v. TheStreet.Com, 273 F…
…undue burden (“Privacy Interests”). CI-4 - Preserving the fundamental rights of suspects or others under criminal investigation – including due process right to a fair trial and impartial jury unimpaired by excessive publicity, release of potentially inadmissible evidence for the Criminal…
…On March 18, 2016, this Court entered a Protective Order (DE 62) for the privacy of the parties and deponents. Non-Party Jane Doe 43 was a fact witness and deponent in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case. She provided both…
…this case” (Brief at 2); • Ms. Maxwell objected to the second deposition, based in part on her privacy concerns about testifying to her adult consensual activity (id.); • Judge Sweet overruled Ms. Maxwell’s objections to the deposition, ruling that her …
… Information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be information that is confidential and implicates is covered by common law and statutory privacy interests protections of (a) plaintiff Virginia Roberts Giuffre and (b) defendant Ghislaine Maxwell or (c) any non-party that was subject…
…to non-parties would throw those non- parties into the middle of this frenzy, and unfairly do irreparable harm to their privacy and reputational interests,” provides no basis for allowing him to litigate behind a curtain. Dkt. 980 at 3…
…and 3, implicit in the Court’s Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions, was to afford each Nonparty the opportunity for notice and the chance to be heard prior to unsealing materials that implicate their privacy rights. (Doc. 1044…
…16 Page 3 of 7 3. Information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be information that is confidential and implicates common law and statutory privacy interests of (a) plaintiff Virginia Roberts Giuffre and (b) defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. 4. CONFIDENTIAL information shall not be…
…opinion, the Second Circuit suggested in dicta that “[t]he District Court may also order the parties to identify and notify additional parties whose privacy interests would likely be 1 Based on lessons learned from past rounds of unsealing, the…
…that as to parts of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell’s deposition concerning her sexual relationships with consenting adults, her privacy interests outweighed any presumption of public access; (4) finding the countervailing privacy interests of various pseudonymized third-parties to outweigh any…
…undue burden (“Privacy Interests”). CI-4 - Preserving the fundamental rights of suspects or others under criminal investigation – including due process right to a fair trial and impartial jury unimpaired by excessive publicity, release of potentially inadmissible evidence for the Criminal…
…08/16 Page 5 of 13 faith basis for such designation, and that disclosure of such information to persons other than those permitted access to such material would cause a privacy harm to the designating party.” Protective Order at ¶ 8…
…7454 Start today. (0)20 7454 5382 5382 About PR Newswire Contact PR Newswire PR Newswire's Terms of Use Apply Privacy and Cookie Policy Site Map RSS Feeds Blog Copyright © …
…that as to parts of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell’s deposition concerning her sexual relationships with consenting adults, her privacy interests outweighed any presumption of public access; (4) finding the countervailing privacy interests of various pseudonymized third-parties to outweigh any…
…the deposition transcript would be shielded from public release by the Protective Order. Judge Sweet agreed, saying any “privacy concerns are alleviated by the Protective Order in this case, drafted by Defendant.” In turn, the Second Circuit in Brown v…
…embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of standing in the community, loss of dignity and invasion of privacy in her public and private life not less than $30,000,000.00. a. Computation Analysis i. Under New York law, defamation…
…put in the 2 press a number of statements regarding that, and I can't 3 imagine that it is to the extent she claims privacy now, those 4 might be relevant in our case both on credibility and also…
Comments