…stating that Doe 1 and Doe 2 did not generally object to unsealing documents, (2) objecting to the unsealing of their names out of respect for their privacy, and (3) requesting excerpts of sealed materials that mention them for their…
…Reality: Courts routinely seal records concerning underage victims – well beyond replacing their names with initials – and victims do not forego their rights to privacy merely because they have played a role in a civil or criminal case against perpetrators. As…
…2021 (“January 6 Order”), see DE 233. 1 This appears to be yet another attempt by the Dershowitz parties to evade this Court’s carefully constructed privacy protections, by requesting (i) access to non-party information from Giuffre v. Maxwell…
…this Court entered a Protective Order (DE 62) for the privacy of the parties and deponents. 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 928 Filed 10/19/17 Page 2 of 11 2 Case 1:15-cv-07433…
…and 1320-40 in the above-captioned case because they contain personally identifiable information, the disclosure of which could threaten the safety and privacy of named individuals. Counsel shall redact the personally identifiable information and re-file the stricken documents…
…task. As the Court’s opinion recognizes in connection with the remaining sealed materials, the district court is better positioned to communicate with the parties and any nonparties whose privacy interests might be affected by unsealing. On that score, it…
…task. As the Court’s opinion recognizes in connection with the remaining sealed materials, the district court is better positioned to communicate with the parties and any nonparties whose privacy interests might be affected by unsealing. On that score, it…
…Non-Parties List: Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (collectively, the “Original Parties”) each have submitted under seal a list of non-parties whose privacy, reputational or other interests may be implicated by the unsealing of the Sealed Materials…
…into the Court’s balancing of considerations – as it is ultimately the responsibility of this Court, and not the parties or even non-parties, to protect non-party privacy interests. I. Mr. Dershowitz’s Proposed Disclosure of Confidential Maxwell Materials …
…That protocol, which was first put in place more than two years ago, balances the presumption of public access to judicial documents against the privacy, reputational, and other countervailing interests that support the continued sealing of certain of the previously…
…she does not wish to further address those objections. See Dkt. 1230 at 2. Each of the listed Does has counsel who have ably asserted their own respective privacy rights. Ms. Maxwell therefore leaves it to this Court to conduct…
…have failed to meet the burden to demonstrate that any of these documents should remain sealed. Generalized Privacy Concerns Do Not Warrant Sealing This Court has already held that generalized concerns about embarrassment are insufficient to support sealing judicial documents…
…no. 1321 at 2.) Second, even so, the privacy interests at stake outweigh any presumption of public access to the Document. The public does not have an absolute right to access and inspect court documents; rather, courts may exercise their…
…(2) objected to the unsealing of their names out of respect for their “privacy,” and (3) requested excerpts for their “review.” They also provided Doe 1’s current address—the same Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP…
… Ms. Maxwell objects to the Requests to the extent they seek information that is confidential and implicates Ms. Maxwell’s privacy interests. 9. Ms. Maxwell incorporates by reference every general objection set forth above into each specific response set forth…
…were retained to represent her in this matter. The privacy interests at stake in this litigation are the subject of considerable complexity that Doe 171’s undersigned counsel are still attempting to digest. Although Doe 171’s undersigned counsel still…
…Protocol, is that the “solicitation and receipt of objections from Non-Parties who wish to participate is intended merely to aid the Court in balancing privacy and other interests against the public’s right of access.” (Protocol at 5.) Accordingly…
…the identity of Ms. Giuffre's minor children, and to protect Ms. Giuffre's privacy interests which are naturally implicated in the potential release of domestic violence records. Colorado statutes recognize and protect the privacy of domestic violence victims, see…
…1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1285 Filed 12/05/22 Page 2 of 6 information necessary to evaluate her privacy interests at stake.) See also Appendix (Summary Chart).1 While Doe 171 strenuously maintains her right to remain anonymous…
…filing” is misleading. After the objections are considered, it is likely that Non-Parties will be identified because the public interest in disclosure outweighs any asserted privacy interest or other counterailing interest. And third, in response to J. Doe’s…
Comments