…2021 (“January 6 Order”), see DE 233. 1 This appears to be yet another attempt by the Dershowitz parties to evade this Court’s carefully constructed privacy protections, by requesting (i) access to non-party information from Giuffre v. Maxwell…
…this Court entered a Protective Order (DE 62) for the privacy of the parties and deponents. 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 928 Filed 10/19/17 Page 2 of 11 2 Case 1:15-cv-07433…
…the first instance, constitute judicial records and, if so, whether and to what extent such records may be unsealed without infringing upon the privacy and reputational rights of persons not before this Court. See Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d…
…task. As the Court’s opinion recognizes in connection with the remaining sealed materials, the district court is better positioned to communicate with the parties and any nonparties whose privacy interests might be affected by unsealing. On that score, it…
…task. As the Court’s opinion recognizes in connection with the remaining sealed materials, the district court is better positioned to communicate with the parties and any nonparties whose privacy interests might be affected by unsealing. On that score, it…
…Non-Parties List: Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (collectively, the “Original Parties”) each have submitted under seal a list of non-parties whose privacy, reputational or other interests may be implicated by the unsealing of the Sealed Materials…
…and Ms. Maxwell’s privacy interests. Further complicating the review are the numerous and varied legal grounds for sealing and redacting non-judicial and judicial documents. Two general grounds exist. A document may be sealed if it is a non…
…into the Court’s balancing of considerations – as it is ultimately the responsibility of this Court, and not the parties or even non-parties, to protect non-party privacy interests. I. Mr. Dershowitz’s Proposed Disclosure of Confidential Maxwell Materials …
…of any Sealed Materials. The solicitation and receipt of objections from Non-Parties who wish to participate is intended merely to aid the Court in balancing privacy and other interests against the public’s right of access. The Court will…
…20 Page 3 of 22 her counsel agreed, would be honored subject to the few very limited situations in which the public right to access the court files overcomes the privacy interests at stake. ARGUMENT I. Weight of Presumption Each…
…have failed to meet the burden to demonstrate that any of these documents should remain sealed. Generalized Privacy Concerns Do Not Warrant Sealing This Court has already held that generalized concerns about embarrassment are insufficient to support sealing judicial documents…
… Ms. Maxwell objects to the Interrogatories to the extent they seek information that is confidential and implicates Ms. Maxwell’s privacy interests. 9. Ms. Maxwell incorporates by reference every general objection set forth above into each specific response set forth…
…undue burden (“Privacy Interests”). CI-4 - Preserving the fundamental rights of suspects or others under criminal investigation – including due process right to a fair trial and impartial jury unimpaired by excessive publicity, release of potentially inadmissible evidence for the Criminal…
…On March 18, 2016, this Court entered a Protective Order (DE 62) for the privacy of the parties and deponents. Non-Party Jane Doe 43 was a fact witness and deponent in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case. She provided both…
…the identity of Ms. Giuffre's minor children, and to protect Ms. Giuffre's privacy interests which are naturally implicated in the potential release of domestic violence records. Colorado statutes recognize and protect the privacy of domestic violence victims, see…
…this case” (Brief at 2); • Ms. Maxwell objected to the second deposition, based in part on her privacy concerns about testifying to her adult consensual activity (id.); • Judge Sweet overruled Ms. Maxwell’s objections to the deposition, ruling that her …
…Non-Parties List: Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (collectively, the “Original Parties”) each have submitted under seal a list of non-parties whose privacy, reputational or other interests may be implicated by the unsealing of the Sealed Materials…
… Information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be information that is confidential and implicates is covered by common law and statutory privacy interests protections of (a) plaintiff Virginia Roberts Giuffre and (b) defendant Ghislaine Maxwell or (c) any non-party that was subject…
…Court failed to conduct the requisite particularized review when ordering the sealing of the materials at issue. At the same time, we recognize the potential damage to privacy and reputation that may accompany public disclosure of hard‐fought, sensitive litigation…
…to non-parties would throw those non- parties into the middle of this frenzy, and unfairly do irreparable harm to their privacy and reputational interests,” provides no basis for allowing him to litigate behind a curtain. Dkt. 980 at 3…
Comments