…Id. at 2. As this Court knows, the Second Circuit spoke directly to the issues of confidentiality and unsealing of documents in this case and specifically vacated two of the three decisions cited by Maxwell. Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F…
…because defense 23 counsel had the good judgment to live in Colorado and because 24 Colorado has been blessed with frequent snow this season and 25 there was, when we last spoke, about the problem of defense SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS…
…are set for March 13 right now, and 12 we actually had on the agenda, Jeff and I spoke about wanting 13 to talk to you about this today. We had originally anticipated 14 a two-week trial. We have…
…because defense 23 counsel had the good judgment to live in Colorado and because 24 Colorado has been blessed with frequent snow this season and 25 there was, when we last spoke, about the problem of defense SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS…
…error, counsel for Ms. Giuffre spoke with an employee with the ECF help desk who instructed us to inform the Court via letter that he placed a temporary seal on Exhibit 4 to Docket Entry 79, Declaration of Sigrid S…
…are set for March 13 right now, and 12 we actually had on the agenda, Jeff and I spoke about wanting 13 to talk to you about this today. We had originally anticipated 14 a two-week trial. We have…
…is a true and correct copy of the January 3, 2015 Statement issued by Defendant’s spokesman Ross Gow, quoted in the Express. 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 24 Filed 12/17/15 Page 2 of…
…with multiple underage girls, Epstein ultimately pleaded guilty to just a single state charge of soliciting prostitution.) Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 363-11 Filed 08/11/16 Page 4 of 40 A spokesman for Boies, Schiller &…
…Maxwell, the 21 procedural history, but when the Second Circuit spoke with 22 regard to this issue, it was very clear that there had been no 23 effective individualized or particularized assessment of any 24 particular discovery item, deposition testimony…
…next article in the omnibus motion is to 23 exclude testimony references to prior sexual assault. This is 24 an issue that I spoke on yesterday related to another motion 25 regarding the same, so I'll keep it brief. …
…2016, counsel for Ms. Churcher spoke by phone to counsel for Ms. Maxwell and requested an extension of the time to comply with the Subpoena. Ms. Maxwell’s counsel stated that she would agree to adjourn the date only if…
…before 2015 when the purportedly defamatory statement was published. Ms. Maxwell testified that she has not spoken to Mr. Epstein in 2 years. x Maxwell has not vested any control in Mr. Epstein “in regard to key facts and subject …
…Counsel or Defense Staff are prohibited from further disclosing or disseminating such identifying information. This Order does not prohibit Defense Counsel from publicly referencing individuals who have spoken by name on the public record in this case. 6. The Defendant…
…before 2015 when the purportedly defamatory statement was published. Ms. Maxwell testified that she has not spoken to Mr. Epstein in 2 years. Maxwell has not vested any control in Mr. Epstein “in regard to key facts and subject …
…Counsel or Defense Staff are prohibited from further disclosing or disseminating such identifying information. This Order does not prohibit Defense Counsel from publicly referencing individuals who have spoken by name on the public record in this case. 6. The Defendant…
…interest. There 5 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 23 Filed 12/17/15 Page 11 of 32 is no qualified privilege under New York law when such statements are spoken with malice, knowledge of their falsity, or…
…before 2015 when the purportedly defamatory statement was published. Ms. Maxwell testified that she has not spoken to Mr. Epstein in 2 years. x Maxwell has not vested any control in Mr. Epstein “in regard to key facts and subject …
…media for their various roles in recent allegation that defendant hired professional dissemination of sexual assault allegations made spokespersons to issue defamatory statements against him was not a non-actionable statement about them to media on his behalf was sufficient …
…In addition , as this Court concluded in denying Maxwell's motion to dismiss , "[t]here is no qualified privilege under New York law when such statements are spoken with malice , knowledge of their falsity , or reckless disregard for their truth. "…
…Compl. ¶ 24 (oral statement by Maxwell); Pl.’s Opp’n at 11-12 (contrasting a case “that sounded in slander (spoken defamation), whereas this is a libel case (written defamation)”); Id. at 24 (“[A]n action lies in slander for…
Comments