gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1332.10.pdf PDF
…are set for March 13 right now, and 12 we actually had on the agenda, Jeff and I spoke about wanting 13 to talk to you about this today. We had originally anticipated 14 a two-week trial. We have…
…are set for March 13 right now, and 12 we actually had on the agenda, Jeff and I spoke about wanting 13 to talk to you about this today. We had originally anticipated 14 a two-week trial. We have…
…are set for March 13 right now, and 12 we actually had on the agenda, Jeff and I spoke about wanting 13 to talk to you about this today. We had originally anticipated 14 a two-week trial. We have…
…spoke directly to the issues of confidentiality and unsealing of documents in this case and specifically vacated two of the three decisions cited by Maxwell. Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir. 2019). The same ruling uprooted…
…because defense 23 counsel had the good judgment to live in Colorado and because 24 Colorado has been blessed with frequent snow this season and 25 there was, when we last spoke, about the problem of defense SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS…
…because defense 23 counsel had the good judgment to live in Colorado and because 24 Colorado has been blessed with frequent snow this season and 25 there was, when we last spoke, about the problem of defense SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS…
…1 (Case called) 2 THE COURT: Like all of you, you woke up in the middle 3 of the night thinking about this case. I would like to see if 4 I can clarify my understanding. 5 In the motion…
…Maxwell, the 21 procedural history, but when the Second Circuit spoke with 22 regard to this issue, it was very clear that there had been no 23 effective individualized or particularized assessment of any 24 particular discovery item, deposition testimony…
…2016, counsel for Ms. Churcher spoke by phone to counsel for Ms. Maxwell and requested an extension of the time to comply with the Subpoena. Ms. Maxwell’s counsel stated that she would agree to adjourn the date only if…
…plaintiff Virginia L. Giuffre ("Giuffre" or the "Giuffre") alleging defamation. Upon the facts and conclusions set forth below, the motion is denied. The contested facts derived from discovery subject to the Protective Order of March 17, 2016 have been redacted…
…the defense, in clear violation of Rule 45(a)(4). LEGAL AUTHORITY Rule 16(b) permits modification of a scheduling order only upon a showing of “good cause.” To satisfy the good cause standard “the party must show that, despite…
…the defense, in clear violation of Rule 45(a)(4). LEGAL AUTHORITY Rule 16(b) permits modification of a scheduling order only upon a showing of “good cause.” To satisfy the good cause standard “the party must show that, despite…
…After receiving a request from a Non-Party, we anticipate it will take up to a week per Non-Party to agree to the excerpts to send to them for review. But on balance we agree that having a sense…
…to bully the victim back into silence. But this story will not end here. Defamation law protects victims when they are courageous enough to stand up against their abuser’s false character assaults. Based on her well-pled Complaint, Ms…
…the defense, in clear violation of Rule 45(a)(4). LEGAL AUTHORITY Rule 16(b) permits modification of a scheduling order only upon a showing of “good cause.” To satisfy the good cause standard “the party must show that, despite…
…statements . . . ended up in the headlines and quoted in the media”). Third, the Complaint lacks sufficient allegations to establish defamation per se. Plaintiff insists that the pleading standard is far more lenient for libel claims than for slander claims. Pl…
…attacked in a newspaper, I may write to that paper to rebut the 1 charges, and I may at the same time retort upon my assailant, when such retort is a necessary part of my defense, or fairly arises out…
…error, counsel for Ms. Giuffre spoke with an employee with the ECF help desk who instructed us to inform the Court via letter that he placed a temporary seal on Exhibit 4 to Docket Entry 79, Declaration of Sigrid S…
…Counsel or Defense Staff are prohibited from further disclosing or disseminating such identifying information. This Order does not prohibit Defense Counsel from publicly referencing individuals who have spoken by name on the public record in this case. 6. The Defendant…
Comments