gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.35.0.pdf PDF
…2300 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................…
…2300 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................…
…Access ............................................................................... 4 2.1.2 The First Amendment Compels Access .................................................................. 5 2.2 Standard for Sealing a Court Record .....................................................................…
…446-2300 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.......................................................................................................... ii …
…MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.…
…Ghislaine Maxwell) and her damages at issue in Maxwell. Dershowitz is entitled to discover and use that evidence here. Dershowitz can easily surpass the standard required to access materials under the Protective Order. When there has been “reasonable reliance” on…
…Argument................................5 Ms. Giuffre’s Deposition in the Defamation Case...........................................................................7 The Settlement of the Defamation Case..........................................................................................7 LEGAL STANDARD<…
…unwarranted and prejudicial pretrial publicity by the Government, its agents, and lawyers for alleged witnesses. Legal Standard More than fifty years ago, warning of the danger of pretrial publicity to fair trials, the Supreme Court directed trial judges to take…
…THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS CASE .................................................................. 9 IV. ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................... 10 A. Legal Standard ..........................................................…
…That Is Not Represented by Any Existing Party ........................................13 II. THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE COMMON LAW REQUIRE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTS ................................14 A. Legal Standard .................................…
…each of these attempts as failed and then states that this Court’s decisions somehow are the law of the case. Yet, the very standard she cites in her response provides an exception that clearly applies here. Id. at 2…
…Interest in Access
That Is Not Represented by Any Existing Party ........................................13
II. THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE COMMON LAW REQUIRE
PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTS ................................14
A. Legal
…permit the filing of Ms. Maxwell's Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Omnibus Motion in Limine in excess of the 25 pages permitted pursuant to this Court's Practice Standard 2D. As grounds, she further avers as follows: Plaintiffs Omnibus…
…THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS CASE .................................................................. 9 IV. ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................... 10 A. Legal Standard ..........................................................…
…Privilege Argument ................................ 5 Ms. Giuffre’s Deposition in the Defamation Case........................................................................... 7 The Settlement of the Defamation Case .......................................................................................... 7 LEGAL STAND…
…and particularized need for access. General and conclusory allegations in support of an application for disclosure will not satisfy this threshold requirement.” Id. (internal citations and quotations omitted). The Defendant cannot meet that standard here. Indeed, she cannot approach that…
…FAC”) (Doc. 1111-1). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (Maxwell) and non-party John Doe (Doe) oppose the proposed intervention and access on the grounds that the USVI does not meet the applicable standard for modifying the Protective Order. See Martindell v…
…Argument................................5 Ms. Giuffre’s Deposition in the Defamation Case...........................................................................7 The Settlement of the Defamation Case..........................................................................................7 LEGAL STANDARD<…
…THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS CASE .................................................................. 9 IV. ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................... 10 A. Legal Standard ..........................................................…
…2014). ARGUMENT I. The Attorney-Client and Work Product Privilege Standards and Limitations a. The Attorney-Client Privilege 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 155 Filed 05/20/16 Page 3 of 15 “The a…
…Interest in Access
That Is Not Represented by Any Existing Party ........................................13
II. THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE COMMON LAW REQUIRE
PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTS ................................14
A. Legal
Comments