gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.35.0.pdf PDF
…2300 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................…
…2300 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................…
…OBJECTIONS TO UNSEALING Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1247 Filed 03/18/22 Page 2 of 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................1 ARGUMENT ..............................................…
…LAP Document 1237 Filed 01/12/22 Page 2 of 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................1 ARGUMENT ......................................................................................................…
…Access .............................................................................. 10 2.1.2 The First Amendment Compels Access ................................................................ 12 2.2 Standard for Sealing a Court Record ........................................................................…
…unwarranted and prejudicial pretrial publicity by the Government, its agents, and lawyers for alleged witnesses. Legal Standard More than fifty years ago, warning of the danger of pretrial publicity to fair trials, the Supreme Court directed trial judges to take…
…THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS CASE .................................................................. 9 IV. ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................... 10 A. Legal Standard ..........................................................…
…139 (2d Cir. 2016). “A district court abuses its discretion if it (1) bases its decision on an error of law or uses the wrong legal standard; (2) bases its decision on a clearly erroneous factual finding; or (3) reaches…
…That Is Not Represented by Any Existing Party ........................................13 II. THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE COMMON LAW REQUIRE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTS ................................14 A. Legal Standard .................................…
…Computation Of Damages Complies With Rule 26............6 D. Ms. Giuffre Can Base Alleged Lost Income On “The Jobs of Others” – i.e., On Standard Economic Estimation Techniques. ...........................................................8 E. Plaintiff Has Not Refused To Provide Addresses And Te…
…Interest in Access
That Is Not Represented by Any Existing Party ........................................13
II. THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE COMMON LAW REQUIRE
PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTS ................................14
A. Legal
…THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS CASE .................................................................. 9 IV. ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................... 10 A. Legal Standard ..........................................................…
…FAC”) (Doc. 1111-1). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (Maxwell) and non-party John Doe (Doe) oppose the proposed intervention and access on the grounds that the USVI does not meet the applicable standard for modifying the Protective Order. See Martindell v…
…be proven by a preponderance of the evidence or the mere greater weight of the evidence. How many feel that regardless of that legal standard you will have to be convinced beyond just the greater weight of the evidence…
…THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS CASE .................................................................. 9 IV. ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................... 10 A. Legal Standard ..........................................................…
…reasons set forth herein, the Court will grant the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. I. Standard of Review - Rule 12(b)(6) I. Standard of Review - Rule 12(b)(6) Under Rule 12(b)(6), a Complaint must be dismissed…
…Interest in Access
That Is Not Represented by Any Existing Party ........................................13
II. THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE COMMON LAW REQUIRE
PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTS ................................14
A. Legal
…scope of public access. July 1, 2021 Hr’g Tr. at 3:18-22. 2 Plaintiff reserves the right to challenge the standard the Court applied in its April 19, 2022, ruling, as well as its factual conclusions. For example…
…. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 II.The Motion to Intervene is Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 III. The Issues and the Applicable Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 IV. The Motion to Unseal the Discovery Documents is Denied .... 24 V. The Summary Judgment Judicial Documents . . . . . . .…
…P. 24(a). Nor has he met Rule 24(b)’s standards for discretionary intervention for four reasons: First, Dershowitz has another forum in which to litigate and defend his reputational interests – a pending defamation action regarding this very case…
…deposition transcript and documents summarizing her deposition contain allegations of misconduct is not enough to warrant continued sealing. “Were this the standard for sealing, it is difficult to imagine any lawsuit in which any of the papers— starting with the…
Comments