…Maxwell’s rights to a fair trial by poisoning any venire and influencing witness testimony. For reasons discussed below, the Court should decline to unseal the identified Sealed Items. I. Ms. Maxwell’s July 22, 2016 deposition must remain sealed. …
…jury, unsealing the deposition material also risks compromising the integrity of witness testimony because it provides an opportunity for a witness to change his or her story to conform to the allegations made in the unsealed (and publicized) material.” Id…
…Court, it didn't have everything. 23 So after the summary judgment, your Honor will 24 remember there was other witness testimony that was presented 25 and put in the court record. There were designations for trial SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS…
…Deposition Designations and Counter-Designations Ms. Maxwell contends that trial deposition designations and counter-designations are not judicial documents: In fact, pre-trial disclosures like this contain the direct witness testimony that the parties were designating as public trial testimony…
…had to review the proposed trial testimony designations for each witness to determine how he would rule on objections to the testimony that would be presented to the jury. As noted above, the trial deposition designations and counter-designations were…
…Inadmissible in the Criminal Action Risks Tainting and Prejudicing the Jury Pool The deposition testimony and witness names and information that may be revealed in this unsealing may or may not be presented (or even admissible) in the Criminal Action…
… potential witness in criminal Note: The deponent is not on the CI-6 trial and deposition testimony Non-Party notification list CI-7 …
… from this 398-5 8.24.16 Rule 23.1; potential witness in criminal trial CI-5; CI-6; Doe to and deposition testimony potential CI-7 remain evidence. …
…not do so, and still has not provided this information to date. It is only through deposition testimony that Ms. Maxwell became aware of at least five – if not more – treating health care providers who were never previously identified. Yet…
…not do so, and still has not provided this information to date. It is only through deposition testimony that Ms. Maxwell became aware of at least five – if not more – treating health care providers who were never previously identified. Yet…
…not do so, and still has not provided this information to date. It is only through deposition testimony that Ms. Maxwell became aware of at least five – if not more – treating health care providers who were never previously identified. Yet…
…not do so, and still has not provided this information to date. It is only through deposition testimony that Ms. Maxwell became aware of at least five – if not more – treating health care providers who were never previously identified. Yet…
…order, and thus that the Government's use of her deposition testimony against her would violate her right against compelled self-incrimination. She contends that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the documents covered by the protective order…
…order, and thus that the Government's use of her deposition testimony against her would violate her right against compelled self-incrimination. She contends that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the documents covered by the protective order…
…order, and thus that the Government's use of her deposition testimony against her would violate her right against compelled self-incrimination. She contends that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the documents covered by the protective order…
…order, and thus that the Government's use of her deposition testimony against her would violate her right against compelled self-incrimination. She contends that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the documents covered by the protective order…
…order, and thus that the Government's use of her deposition testimony against her would violate her right against compelled self-incrimination. She contends that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the documents covered by the protective order…
…Martindell. Additionally, it is worth noting Ms. Guiffre has already considered – and advanced to her advantage – the purpose of a witness’s reliance on confidentiality. Mr. Epstein’s deposition testimony itself, including its videotaping, was compelled by this Court over…
…the identity and identifying information as pertains to Plaintiff. These same reports document that Plaintiff was a resident at a drug rehabilitation facility from at least February 1999 until December 1999, whereas she has sworn in deposition testimony, in affidavits…
…problematic, the release of deposition testimony from, or evidentiary and advocate references to, individual Does (which includes many likely testifying witnesses in the criminal trial), in the very weeks leading up to jury selection and testimony risks prejudicing Ms. Maxwell…