…Deposition Designations and Counter-Designations Ms. Maxwell contends that trial deposition designations and counter-designations are not judicial documents: In fact, pre-trial disclosures like this contain the direct witness testimony that the parties were designating as public trial testimony…
…testifying; and (C) the use is allowed by Rule 32(a)(2) through (8). To affirmatively offer evidence in her case in chief through deposition testimony under Rule 32(a)(4), the plaintiff must establish that the witness is unavailable…
…implementing a business model due diligence, product support, and client development. EFTA01097433 DA HMAN E: Expert Witness
…such deposition. In addition to the foregoing, any Party shall be entitled to take the deposition of a witness who will testify at the arbitration but who is unavailable to testify at the hearing to preserve such witness' testimony for…
…19 EFTA00584550 witness discovery. Alternatively, the Court should prohibit Edwards from presenting purported expert witness testimony at trial. CONCLUSION For the reasons …
…for Sanctions; work on Motion to Allow Amendment to Exhibit List; work on Motion for Leave to Disclose Expert Witness; follow up on deposition dates for J. Epstein 04/25/18 SJL Work on Response in Opposition to B. Edwards…
…and supports witness testimony that Thompson used a gun to usher his passengers quickly from his 36-foot power boat and make them swim to shore — whether they knew how to swim or not. "They did not drown because of…
…10 Category 3 – Allegedly privileged communications with Alan Dershowitz In opposition, Ms. Ransome has now backtracked from her deposition testimony and claims she “believed” that Alan Dershowitz was her attorney, even though she then testified that a third person, Mr…
…Ransome to sit for additional questions. The following are 18 the categories of deposition testimony that Defendant seeks for which non-party Ms. Ransome contends are sought only for the purpose of harassment and intimidation: Current paycheck records and…
…Ransome to sit for additional questions. The following are 18 the categories of deposition testimony that Defendant seeks for which non-party Ms. Ransome contends are sought only for the purpose of harassment and intimidation: Current paycheck records and…
…15 Category 3 – Allegedly privileged communications with Alan Dershowitz In opposition, Ms. Ransome has now backtracked from her deposition testimony and claims she “believed” that Alan Dershowitz was her attorney, even though she then testified that a third person, Mr…
…Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum concerning Rothstein, so that the parties to the various lawsuits can secure his deposition testimony. The Court finds that Scott W. Rothstein ("Rothstein") is an important witness, who should have personal knowledge of many…
…Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum concerning Rothstein, so that the parties to the various lawsuits can secure his deposition testimony. The Court finds that Scott W. Rothstein ("Rothstein") is an important witness, who should have personal knowledge of many…
…there would be certain conditions, including the presence of Your Honor. We submit that Mr. Dubin is not a mere third-party witness here, whose deposition testimony would serve as his trial testimony. Surely Mr. Dubin knew the affidavit was…
…¶¶ 21, 23.) II. EPSTEIN'S DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND AFFIDAVIT REGARDING PROBABLE CAUSE A. Epstein Deposition—March 17, 2010 Epstein testified as follows: this evening, responding to a text message. He said karma is going to get him, but it's…
…22 complaint, are false? 23 MR. Form. Misinterprets the 24 witness's testimony. 25 Q Or saying it is true? EFTA01723989 39 1 MR. …
…United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of Florida. Mr. Spinosa's sworn 2004 Examination deposition testimony was relied upon by the Plaintiffs in making the allegations contained herein. On May 18, 2010, Kerstetter was deposed as part of the 2004…
…that moved to quash the relevant subpoena argued that the government could not meet its burden of showing need for deposition testimony until it had at least called the witness before the grand jury). The subject matter of the Litigation…
…at the Final Approval Hearing, you must provide a list of any such witnesses together with a brief summary of each witness' expected testimony at least thirty (30) days prior to the Final Approval Hearing. The failure to provide this…
…that moved to quash the relevant subpoena argued that the government could not meet its burden of showing need for deposition testimony until it had at least called the witness before the grand jury). The subject matter of the Litigation…