…parties’ counsel conduct a review of the sealed and redacted materials, confer and inform the Court by letter about the identity of non-parties identified in the material, and confer and inform the Court by letter of any material in…
…Court of the 15th Cir. for Palm Beach County) ("Epstein v. Edwards"). The Supplemental responses also identified the pleadings, discovery responses and depositions in twenty-four civil proceedings in which Dersbowitz's client, Jeffrey Epstein, is named as a party…
…Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on the individuals identified below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…plainly unreasonable. Finally, it bears emphasizing that virtually all of the prominent individuals accused by Giuffre concerning whom Dershowitz seeks discovery have already been publicly identified by name in deposition testimony which has been unsealed in Maxwell. See Exhibit A…
…served on plaintiff’s counsel Ms. Maxwell’s Initial Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A) Disclosures. The third-listed individual we identified who “likely [has] discoverable information” was Philip Barden, who, we disclosed, had information “concerning press statements . . …
…810 F. Supp. 2d 616, 621–22 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). Those factors and the harm of disclosure must be identified with specificity. Lytle, 810 F. Supp. 2d at 621–22. As set forth below, the Does have failed…
…trial. Ms. Maxwell’s responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories are based on information currently known to her and are given without waiving Ms. Maxwell’s right to use evidence of any subsequently discovered or identified facts, documents or communications. Ms…
…motion also does not directly address the Court’s sound and obvious reason for unsealing, which is that numerous public sources, including a federal complaint she herself voluntarily filed, have already identified her, and described her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein…
…here will unfairly prejudice Ms. Maxwell’s rights to a fair trial by poisoning any venire and influencing witness testimony. For reasons discussed below, the Court should decline to unseal the identified Sealed Items. I. Ms. Maxwell’s July 22…
…Rejecting Dershowitz’s position, the Court specifically structured the protocol to afford notice to those persons identified or otherwise interested in the Sealed Documents and to allow such affected persons the opportunity to object and be heard. As made clear…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on the individuals identified below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger…
…Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on the individuals identified below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger…
…7. Documents are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by placing or affixing on them (in a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) the following or other appropriate notice: “CONFIDENTIAL.” Discovery material designated CONFIDENTIAL shall be identified by Bates number. To…
…are advised in their Objection to Un-Sealing at ¶ 2 that they “understand this Objection will be filed under seal and I will not be identified in any court filing.” Ms. Maxwell remains concerned that Non-Parties will be reluctant…
…UT 84112 (801) 585-52021 1 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private representation. 2…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public…
… Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 201 Filed 06/13/16 Page 2 of 5 identified individuals who may have relevant information about the matters at issue in this case. Certain of those individuals have been the subject…
Comments