…multiple times to propose five motions pertaining to J. Doe 1 and J. Doe 2, as identified on the sealed Non-Party List, with which the Court may begin administering the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions, Dkt. 1044…
…33. She strenuously argues that she has “disclosed” various treatment providers because their names are buried in records that she has belatedly produced and which she obtained only after defense counsel had identified their existence and absence through independent investigation…
…33. She strenuously argues that she has “disclosed” various treatment providers because their names are buried in records that she has belatedly produced and which she obtained only after defense counsel had identified their existence and absence through independent investigation…
…plainly unreasonable. Finally, it bears emphasizing that virtually all of the prominent individuals accused by Giuffre concerning whom Dershowitz seeks discovery have already been publicly identified by name in deposition testimony which has been unsealed in Maxwell. See Exhibit A…
…84112 (801) 585-52021 1 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private representation. Case 1:15-cv-07433…
…served on plaintiff’s counsel Ms. Maxwell’s Initial Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A) Disclosures. The third-listed individual we identified who “likely [has] discoverable information” was Philip Barden, who, we disclosed, had information “concerning press statements . . …
…UT 84112 (801) 585-52022 2 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private representation. …
…sexual contact ever took place between the pair as "false and hurtful to me." Interview request The woman, identified by Buckingham Palace as Virginia Roberts, first named the prince in a civil motion filed December 30 in the U.S…
…LAP Document 1328-10 Filed 01/05/24 Page 4 of 23 Confidential Page 2 0 1 G. Maxwell - Confidential 2 anyone in any of Mr. Epstein ' s five homes 3 that you have identified? 4 A. Yes . 5 Q…
…here will unfairly prejudice Ms. Maxwell’s rights to a fair trial by poisoning any venire and influencing witness testimony. For reasons discussed below, the Court should decline to unseal the identified Sealed Items. I. Ms. Maxwell’s July 22…
…and other witness testimony contradict Plaintiff’s deposition ......................................................................................................................... 5 E. Plaintiff identified new witnesses in her Rule 26 disclosures after her deposition .......... 6 II. PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL IN…
…UT 84112 (801) 585-52021 1 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private representation. …
…the alleged countervailing interests that are insufficient to outweigh the presumption of access to these judicial documents. As set forth in detail below, there is no basis identified in the Objections for the Court to continue sealing Dkt. Entries 143…
…UT 84112 (801) 585-52021 1 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private representation. …
…84112 (801) 585-52021 1 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private representation. Case 1:15-cv-07433…
…explained why they waited more than two months to disclose the witness, nor why they represented to the Court that she was a “recent” discovery. 1 BACKGROUND Plaintiff first identified Sarah Ransome as a witness on January 13, 2016…
…has not provided this information to date. It is only through deposition testimony that Ms. Maxwell became aware of at least five – if not more – treating health care providers who were never previously identified. Yet, Plaintiff has never supplemented her…
…Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on the individuals identified below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger…
…defense case-in-chief. In light of the well settled rules that a rebuttal expert is “intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on the same subject matter identified” in the expert report of another party, there would be no…
…produced or answered discovery based on the understanding that such discovery would be subject to the Protective Order, (b) persons who are identified as allegedly having engaged in sex acts with Plaintiff or other alleged victims, or facilitated such acts…
Comments