… Intervenors’ First Proposition of Law: For minor victims of sexual abuse, “redactions should be applied sparingly to shield only information that would identify those who have not already been publicly identified.” DE 1248, at 2. The Reality: Courts routinely seal…
… The Court has approved Ms. Giuffre’s proposed redactions and has ordered limited additional redactions, identified by the Court in its review of both parties’ proposed redactions, relating to (1) personally identifiable information and (2) the identities of certain nonparties…
…MAXWELL, Defendant. / NOTICE OF REDACTION REQUEST – TRANSCRIPT In accordance with this Court’s forms and procedures, undersigned counsel acknowledges that redactions other than certain personal identifiers requires a separate Motion for Reda…
…parties’ counsel conduct a review of the sealed and redacted materials, confer and inform the Court by letter about the identity of non-parties identified in the material, and confer and inform the Court by letter of any material in…
…already reviewed and approved Plaintiff’s proposed redactions for these documents, and Plaintiff has verified that redactions are in place for each of the categories of information identified in the Court’s July 30 and October 20 orders. ECF No…
…here will unfairly prejudice Ms. Maxwell’s rights to a fair trial by poisoning any venire and influencing witness testimony. For reasons discussed below, the Court should decline to unseal the identified Sealed Items. I. Ms. Maxwell’s July 22…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616, 621–22 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). Facts allegedly supporting sealing and the harm of disclosure must be identified with specificity. Lytle, 810 F. Supp. 2d at 621–22. It does not appear…
…produced or answered discovery based on the understanding that such discovery would be subject to the Protective Order, (b) persons who are identified as allegedly having engaged in sex acts with Plaintiff or other alleged victims, or facilitated such acts…
…Order established a framework for unsealing the identities of certain Does. That is, each row identified an individual Doe, enumerated the relevant docket entries in which that Doe is mentioned, and stated the Court’s reasoning for whether to unseal…
…are advised in their Objection to Un-Sealing at ¶ 2 that they “understand this Objection will be filed under seal and I will not be identified in any court filing.” Ms. Maxwell remains concerned that Non-Parties will be reluctant…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded itto the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…already reviewed and approved Plaintiff’s proposed redactions for these documents, and Plaintiff has verified that redactions are in place for each of the categories of information identified in the Court’s July 30 and October 20 orders. ECF No…
…(emphasis added). It further provides that, upon such a designation-removal request by one Dershowitz party, the other Dershowitz party should “promptly review” the identified document and “remove the confidentiality designation . . . if appropriate.” Id. But even if presently sealed materials…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…and submit this response based on the known portions of the documents as well as the parties’ public representations as to their contents. Intervenors incorporate by reference their arguments offered in response to the alleged “Countervailing Interests” identified by Ms…
…1053 at 1. Neither Doe 1 nor Doe 2 requested excerpts of the sealed materials that mention their names, and Maxwell has not identified any compelling reason to continue to keep their identities hidden. In fact, Doe 1 and Doe…
…723, 725 (2d Cir. 2017). We have identified at least twelve applicable to Ms. Maxwell in this action. Those reviewing the Sealed Materials on Ms. Maxwell’s behalf therefore were required to determine while reading the materials (a) the weight…
Comments