…Court or any Orders of the Court. 3. Ms. Maxwell objects to the Requests to the extent they seek documents or information protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work-product doctrine, Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence…
…Court or any Orders of the Court. 3. Ms. Maxwell objects to the Requests to the extent they seek documents or information protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work-product doctrine, Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence…
…Law ................................................................ 7 B. All of the Information Sought by the Subpoena Is, At a Minimum, Protected by the Qualified Privilege Under the Shield Law ....................... 9 1. The Info…
…the subpoena served on Ms. Ransome seeks documents that are wholly irrelevant to the underlying action including protected financial information and documents or communications between Sarah Ransome and her attorneys, which are protected by the attorney- client privilege and the…
…the subpoena served on Ms. Ransome seeks documents that are wholly irrelevant to the underlying action including protected financial information and documents or communications between Sarah Ransome and her attorneys, which are protected by the attorney- client privilege and the…
…opinion, the Second Circuit suggested in dicta that “[t]he District Court may also order the parties to identify and notify additional parties whose privacy interests would likely be 1 Based on lessons learned from past rounds of unsealing, the…
…the subpoena served on Ms. Ransome seeks documents that are wholly irrelevant to the underlying action including protected financial information and documents or communications between Sarah Ransome and her attorneys, which are protected by the attorney- client privilege and the…
…Court or any Orders of the Court. 3. Ms. Maxwell objects to the Requests to the extent they seek documents or information protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work-product doctrine, Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence…
…presumption of access to these documents, the Court should also find that Ms. Maxwell and J. Doe have failed to identify any non-generalized, non-speculative interest that would outweigh these First Amendment and common law rights of access. Therefore…
…information itself (ii) These acts may be reqtJired only as directed in the order, and the privileged or protected, will enable the parties to asses.~ the claim. order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a…
…under Rule 26.3(c)(7), Southern District of New York Local Civil Rules. 8. “Identify” (with respect to persons) incorporates the definition as set forth in Rule 26.3(c)(3), Southern District of New York Local Rules. Therefore…
…days of service of the Excerpts, the Non-Party may submit to the Court an objection.” Any such “objection” must “state briefly the reasons for the objection and identify any countervailing interest that militates against unsealing.” Id. Then, “[w]ithin…
…that civil and criminal proceedings might be brought against them and that the dominant purpose of the investigations was to identify the causes of the explosion so that their solicitors could provide legal advice in connection with the expected proceedings…
…Giuffre of any practical ability to use the discovery, and, importantly, it was incumbent on Defendant to identify this account. The Second Circuit has stated, “[w]here documents, witnesses, or information of any kind relevant issues in litigation is or…
…Giuffre of any practical ability to use the discovery, and, importantly, it was incumbent on Defendant to identify this account. The Second Circuit has stated, “[w]here documents, witnesses, or information of any kind relevant issues in litigation is or…
…Giuffre of any practical ability to use the discovery, and, importantly, it was incumbent on Defendant to identify this account. The Second Circuit has stated, “[w]here documents, witnesses, or information of any kind relevant issues in litigation is or…