…and it is my understanding that you represent Ghislaine Maxwell. I am working on an article about the legal fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein case. I anticipate mentioning the lawsuit filed earlier this year by Virginia Roberts Guiffee against Ms…
…and it is my understanding that you represent Ghislaine Maxwell. I am working on an article about the legal fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein case. I anticipate mentioning the lawsuit filed earlier this year by Virginia Roberts Guiffee against Ms…
…2019). 4. Notice of Appellate Rights: The Protocol will include the provision notifying non-parties of their appellate rights with respect to any decision to unseal a document mentioning their name. That provision will provide that “[a]n order from…
…and it is my understanding that you represent Ghislaine Maxwell. I am working on an article about the legal fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein case. I anticipate mentioning the lawsuit filed earlier this year by Virginia Roberts Guiffee against Ms…
…respect to such evidentiary and discovery matters can cause substantial harm” and that such motions “are therefore of value to those monitoring the federal court,” rendering them “subject to at least some presumption of public access.” 929 F.3d at…
…case. The Court should not allow such callous abuse of a First Amendment right, particularly as there is no merit to Dershowitz’s claim (Br. at 21) that ‘public monitoring has an important role to play here.’” Id. at 19…
…Access. In their reply submission, Doe 144 again presents three principal reasons that the Court should not unseal material mentioning them: (1) that the presumption of public access here is low; (2) that any public value of the material is…
…redactions of yet-to-be-noticed Non-Party names (if any) Unseal in full (no applicable Brown minimal redactions or yet- 165-11 to-be-noticed Non-Party names) Unseal portions mentioning Doe 1 or Doe 2 (pg…
…The paper’s value to “those monitoring the federal courts” would be “negligible,” id., since the federal court would have exercised no judicial authority in connection with the paper. 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 996 Filed…
…Maxwell anticipates more extensive briefing on this issue in support of Mr. Epstein’s Motion to Quash, a few facts bear mentioning here: x Ms. Maxwell was the employee of Mr. Epstein --in the 1990s -- not the other way around…
…14 great weight is given to documents that are material to particular judicial decisions and thus critical to ‘determining litigants’ substantive rights -- conduct at the heart of Article III -- and . . . public monitoring of that conduct.’” All Funds, 643 F. Supp…
…50). A. Non-Response from Does 1 and 2 Not Dispositive of Countervailing Interests Plaintiff argues that all documents mentioning Does 1 and 2 should be released because neither requested excerpts nor interposed any objection. She also claims that some…
…See Amodeo, 71 F.3d at 1051. Accordingly, given the public’s interest in monitoring the judicial functions overseeing this case, that with important and national ramifications that have been widely reported in the media, the deposition material should be…
…3 Finally, Doe 171 asks that the Court redact portions of the November 18, 2022, hearing transcript—specifically the positions mentioning her. There is no basis, however, for sealing the transcript to a public hearing that was attended by several…
…of the presumption of public access by evaluating “the role of the material at issue in the exercise of the Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” United States v…
…Maxwell anticipates more extensive briefing on this issue in support of Mr. Epstein’s Motion to Quash, a few facts bear mentioning here: Ms. Maxwell was the employee of Mr. Epstein --in the 1990s -- not the other way around…
…criminal proceedings, Maxwell instead criticizes the court-ordered unsealing process generally, claiming that the unsealing process has been weaponized against her and that the media has not “served the function of ‘monitoring the federal courts.’” Maxwell Br. at 2. Maxwell…
…Document 315-2, 08/09/2019, 977-1 Filed2628211, 08/09/19Page16 Page of 1625 …
…such 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 995 Filed 10/02/19 Page 5 of 11 evidentiary and discovery matters can cause substantial harm. Such materials are therefore of value to those monitoring the federal courts. Thus…
…s victims. Separately, the Court shall provide to the USVI a copy of a prior order, docketed under seal, explaining why the Court-ordered disclosure to Mr. Dershowitz of materials mentioning him (See Order, dated Sept. 9, 2020 [dkt. no…
Comments