…The Court Should Unseal Portions of Docket Entries the Second Circuit Already Released. .................................................................................................................................... 6 III. The Court Should Unseal Portions of Documents Mentioning Doe 1 and Doe 2. ... 6 IV. …
…nevertheless, important to the public's interest in 17 monitoring federal courts' exercise of their Article III powers 18 that the public review the documents. 19 With this presumption of public access in mind, the 20 Court turns to the…
…for a 15 dispositive motion. It's nevertheless important to the 16 public's interest in monitoring federal courts' exercise of 17 their Article III powers. 18 With this presumption of public access in mind, the 19 Court turns to…
…for a 15 dispositive motion. It's nevertheless important to the 16 public's interest in monitoring federal courts' exercise of 17 their Article III powers. 18 With this presumption of public access in mind, the 19 Court turns to…
…Access. In their reply submission, Doe 144 again presents three principal reasons that the Court should not unseal material mentioning them: (1) that the presumption of public access here is low; (2) that any public value of the material is…
…redactions of yet-to-be-noticed Non-Party names (if any) Unseal in full (no applicable Brown minimal redactions or yet- 165-11 to-be-noticed Non-Party names) Unseal portions mentioning Doe 1 or Doe 2 (pg…
… It is, 2 nevertheless, important to the public's interest in monitoring 3 federal courts' exercise of their Article 3 powers. The Court 4 keeps this somewhat less substantial public presumption in mind 5 in determining whether it is outweighed…
…. in the exercise of Article III” authority, and “the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” Brown, 929 F.3d at 49. That analytical jump is unwarranted outside the habeas setting where one cannot necessarily conclude…
…4 Even in one of the cases that Does 55 and 56 cite, the Court permitted redactions of only the names and personally identifiable information of minors, not wholesale sealing of judicial documents mentioning minors. See United States v. Johnson…
…of the presumption of public access by evaluating “the role of the material at issue in the exercise of the Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” United States v…
…access that should be accorded it. The weight accorded a judicial document depends upon its role “in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” Id. at 49…
…1995)). Thus, “professional and public monitoring” of the courts “is an essential feature of democratic control” of the third branch of government, which necessarily requires public “access to testimony and documents that are 16 Case: Case:24-182, 24…
…Does 1 & 2, provide them upon request with all excerpts of Sealed Items mentioning their names, and then consider their objections if any reflects a review by Non-Party rather than by Motion and comports with the paragraph 2 of…
…15:19–22. If Judge Sweet did not rely on a portion of the deposition in issuing a decision, the public’s interest in “monitoring federal courts’ exercise of their Article III powers” is correspondingly less. Id. at 3:17…
Comments