…nevertheless, important to the public's interest in 17 monitoring federal courts' exercise of their Article III powers 18 that the public review the documents. 19 With this presumption of public access in mind, the 20 Court turns to the…
…The paper’s value to “those monitoring the federal courts” would be “negligible,” id., since the federal court would have exercised no judicial authority in connection with the paper. 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 996 Filed…
…Maxwell anticipates more extensive briefing on this issue in support of Mr. Epstein’s Motion to Quash, a few facts bear mentioning here: x Ms. Maxwell was the employee of Mr. Epstein --in the 1990s -- not the other way around…
…was advising Ms. Giuffre about how to maximize her payments for selling her story, first raised the idea of mentioning Professor Dershowitz in connection with the alleged abuse, despite the fact that there was “no proof” that he was involved…
…50). A. Non-Response from Does 1 and 2 Not Dispositive of Countervailing Interests Plaintiff argues that all documents mentioning Does 1 and 2 should be released because neither requested excerpts nor interposed any objection. She also claims that some…
…to a 'luxury hotel' in the New York area, surrender all her travel documents and be subject to GPS monitoring. But Judge Nathan ruled the British socialite was a significant flight risk, citing her 'substantial international' ties and 'extraordinary financial…
…Maxwell anticipates more extensive briefing on this issue in support of Mr. Epstein’s Motion to Quash, a few facts bear mentioning here: Ms. Maxwell was the employee of Mr. Epstein --in the 1990s -- not the other way around…
…Document 315-2, 08/09/2019, 977-1 Filed2628211, 08/09/19Page16 Page of 1625 …
…Ms. Giuffre attempts no rejoinder to the reasoning of Mokhiber and its progeny: that modern discovery motions are core judicial processes that “may prove decisive to the outcome of particular disputes” and therefore must be open to public monitoring. Mokhiber…
…s victims. Separately, the Court shall provide to the USVI a copy of a prior order, docketed under seal, explaining why the Court-ordered disclosure to Mr. Dershowitz of materials mentioning him (See Order, dated Sept. 9, 2020 [dkt. no…
…weight afforded to the presumption of access is “governed by the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” Lugosch v…
…presumption of access, which is a function of "the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power" and "the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts." See id.; Stern v…
…of access. “[T]he presumption of access must be governed by the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts. Generally…
…s plight. However, when the Article III power of the Court is invoked, “access to testimony and documents” makes monitoring necessary to instill in the public “confidence in the conscientiousness, reasonableness, or honesty of judicial proceedings.” United States v. Amodeo…
…Maxwell anticipates more extensive briefing on this issue in support of Mr. Epstein’s Motion to Quash, a few facts bear mentioning here: x Ms. Maxwell was the employee of Mr. Epstein --in the 1990s -- not the other way around…
…which applies to regulation 5(3), provides that the Safety Management System issue shall address monitoring performance and ‘the mechanisms for investigation and taking corrective action in the case of non compliance’ (paragraph 4(f)). Paragraph 4(f) also provides…
…DocumentDocument 217-1, 07/03/2019, 968 Filed2600298, 07/03/19Page16 Page 16 of 25 …
…the Southern District of Florida, ordered the portions of the Joinder Motion pertaining to non-parties including Ms. Maxwell stricken as “immaterial and impertinent,” and restricted the documents mentioning “lurid details” from public access. Mot. to Dism. at 4-5.…
…DocumentDocument 273-2, 08/09/2019, 978 Filed2628218, 08/09/19 Page16 Page 17 of of …
…Maxwell anticipates more extensive briefing on this issue in support of Mr. Epstein’s Motion to Quash, a few facts bear mentioning here: Ms. Maxwell was the employee of Mr. Epstein --in the 1990s -- not the other way around…
Comments