…The Court Should Unseal Portions of Docket Entries the Second Circuit Already Released. .................................................................................................................................... 6 III. The Court Should Unseal Portions of Documents Mentioning Doe 1 and Doe 2. ... 6 IV. …
…nevertheless, important to the public's interest in 17 monitoring federal courts' exercise of their Article III powers 18 that the public review the documents. 19 With this presumption of public access in mind, the 20 Court turns to the…
…for a 15 dispositive motion. It's nevertheless important to the 16 public's interest in monitoring federal courts' exercise of 17 their Article III powers. 18 With this presumption of public access in mind, the 19 Court turns to…
…for a 15 dispositive motion. It's nevertheless important to the 16 public's interest in monitoring federal courts' exercise of 17 their Article III powers. 18 With this presumption of public access in mind, the 19 Court turns to…
…respect to such evidentiary and discovery matters can cause substantial harm” and that such motions “are therefore of value to those monitoring the federal court,” rendering them “subject to at least some presumption of public access.” 929 F.3d at…
…case. The Court should not allow such callous abuse of a First Amendment right, particularly as there is no merit to Dershowitz’s claim (Br. at 21) that ‘public monitoring has an important role to play here.’” Id. at 19…
…The paper’s value to “those monitoring the federal courts” would be “negligible,” id., since the federal court would have exercised no judicial authority in connection with the paper. 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 996 Filed…
…wrongdoing. In any event, the excerpts mentioning Doe 107 do not accuse them of any wrongdoing at all. The Rule 26 disclosures only state that Doe 107 may have knowledge of the sex-trafficking scheme at issue in this case…
…Maxwell anticipates more extensive briefing on this issue in support of Mr. Epstein’s Motion to Quash, a few facts bear mentioning here: x Ms. Maxwell was the employee of Mr. Epstein --in the 1990s -- not the other way around…
…was advising Ms. Giuffre about how to maximize her payments for selling her story, first raised the idea of mentioning Professor Dershowitz in connection with the alleged abuse, despite the fact that there was “no proof” that he was involved…
…50). A. Non-Response from Does 1 and 2 Not Dispositive of Countervailing Interests Plaintiff argues that all documents mentioning Does 1 and 2 should be released because neither requested excerpts nor interposed any objection. She also claims that some…
…It is, nevertheless, important to the public’ interest in monitoring federal court’s exercise of their Article II powers that the public reviews the documents.”) 6-7; (“Public access to certain parts of this transcript is outweighed by Ms. Maxwell…
…See Amodeo, 71 F.3d at 1051. Accordingly, given the public’s interest in monitoring the judicial functions overseeing this case, that with important and national ramifications that have been widely reported in the media, the deposition material should be…
… It is, 2 nevertheless, important to the public's interest in monitoring 3 federal courts' exercise of their Article 3 powers. The Court 4 keeps this somewhat less substantial public presumption in mind 5 in determining whether it is outweighed…
…4 Even in one of the cases that Does 55 and 56 cite, the Court permitted redactions of only the names and personally identifiable information of minors, not wholesale sealing of judicial documents mentioning minors. See United States v. Johnson…
…of the presumption of public access by evaluating “the role of the material at issue in the exercise of the Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” United States v…
…Maxwell anticipates more extensive briefing on this issue in support of Mr. Epstein’s Motion to Quash, a few facts bear mentioning here: Ms. Maxwell was the employee of Mr. Epstein --in the 1990s -- not the other way around…
…criminal proceedings, Maxwell instead criticizes the court-ordered unsealing process generally, claiming that the unsealing process has been weaponized against her and that the media has not “served the function of ‘monitoring the federal courts.’” Maxwell Br. at 2. Maxwell…
…the Court said that it was “amenable to unsealing portions of documents mentioning non-parties rather than waiting to unseal the entirety of a given document until all non-parties have provided input.” Intervenors ask that the Court follow the…
…Ms. Giuffre attempts no rejoinder to the reasoning of Mokhiber and its progeny: that modern discovery motions are core judicial processes that “may prove decisive to the outcome of particular disputes” and therefore must be open to public monitoring. Mokhiber…
Comments