…unsealing has not yet expired. to Improper Objection 344 Already public. 346 Unseal in full. Note: Original parties agree. 346-1 Unseal in full. Note: Original parties agree. Unseal and redact only names and identifying …
…NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, The Original Parties jointly write to seek clarification of the following parts of the Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions, ECF No. 1044: at a time…
…motions under its Order and Protocol (DE 1044). Unfortunately, counsel for the original parties were unable to reach an agreement as to the sequence of motions. I also write to submit a joint proposed redacted Decided Motions List. First, Ms…
…Non-Parties List: Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (collectively, the “Original Parties”) each have submitted under seal a list of non-parties whose privacy, reputational or other interests may be implicated by the unsealing of the Sealed Materials…
…is that the Non-Parties will 10 initially file their objection under seal. The Court then, 11 sometimes with information from the Original parties, will 12 prepare a redacted copy of those filings so that those can be 13 docketed…
…the resolution of those factual issues. 7. Judicial Documents: In their submissions to the Court, non- parties and the original parties may object to the unsealing of a court submission because it is, in their view, a non- judicial document…
…Non-Parties List: Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (collectively, the “Original Parties”) each have submitted under seal a list of non-parties whose privacy, reputational or other interests may be implicated by the unsealing of the Sealed Materials…
…Non-Parties List: Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (collectively, the “Original Parties”) each have submitted under seal a list of non-parties whose privacy, reputational or other interests may be implicated by the unsealing of the Sealed Materials…
…Non-Parties List: Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (collectively, the “Original Parties”) each have submitted under seal a list of non-parties whose privacy, reputational or other interests may be implicated by the unsealing of the Sealed Materials…
…if any, the Original Parties may file an opposition stating the reasons why any Sealed Item should be unsealed.” DE 1108, at 3. That same paragraph further provides the “objecting Non-Party may file a reply in support of its…
…Airdata Wiman, Inc., 846 So.2d 664, 668 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2003)) (emphasis in original). Indeed, in 2014, the Southern District of Florida rejected the Hearn “at issue” analysis and instead, adopted the analysis of the Third Circuit as outlined…
…The Court notes that it has removed two documents from 24 the parties' chart which it believes were included on the chart 25 in error. First, the original chart lists Docket No. 258-10 as SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. …
…Petitioners; rather, they seek to join this proceeding as parties that could have been permissively joined in the original petition under Rule 20 (“Permissive Joinder of Parties”). As courts generally use the standards of Rule 15 to evaluate such circumstances…
…final determination of substantive legal rights, the public interest in access is not as pressing.” (internal quotation marks omitted; emphasis in original)). 17 Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 121. 12 Case Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP 16-3945, Document …
…Petitioners; rather, they seek to join this proceeding as parties that could have been permissively joined in the original petition under Rule 20 (“Permissive Joinder of Parties”). As courts generally use the standards of Rule 15 to evaluate such circumstances…
…2015, statement incorporated by reference “Ghislaine Maxwell’s original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same,” an earlier statement that had falsely described Giuffre’s factual assertions as “entirely false” and “entirely untrue.” 32. Maxwell made the…
…Airdata Wiman, Inc., 846 So.2d 664, 668 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2003)) (emphasis in original). Indeed, in 2014, the Southern District of Florida rejected the Hearn “at issue” analysis and instead, adopted the analysis of the Third Circuit as outlined…
…redacted name. Further, the Miami Herald correctly notes that the Protocol permits the Court’s staff (with the assistance of the original parties) to redact the non-party submissions and publicly file them via ECF. See DE 1225, at 2…
…filed. Non-Party List. This list is intended to capture all non-parties who should be notified if they are identifiably referenced in the sealed materials. The original parties, non-party J.Doe and intervenors Ms. Brown and the Miami…
…Airdata Wiman, Inc., 846 So.2d 664, 668 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2003)) (emphasis in original). Indeed, in 2014, the Southern District of Florida rejected the Hearn “at issue” analysis and instead, adopted the analysis of the Third Circuit as outlined…
Comments