…10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, The Original Parties write in response to the Court’s December 14, 2020, order directing them to confer about a proposed next set of docket entries…
…2021, letter to the Court to correct certain inaccuracies and to address certain criticisms of the Original Parties. First, Doe criticizes the Original Parties’ compliance with the Court’s unsealing orders and directives to redact the names of non-parties…
…above-captioned matter. 2. On August 26, 2020, the Court ordered the Original Parties to serve Non-Party Notices on all remaining Non-Parties, ECF No. 1107, and the Original Parties agreed to split responsibility for mailing the Non-Party…
…TO INTERVENE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 24(B) ..............................11 A. There Is Significant Overlap Between the Subject Matter of the Original Action and This Motion ....................................................12 …
…August 26, 2020 Order (Doc. #1107), directing the Original Parties to serve Non-Party Notices on all remaining Non-Parties, as well as to Does 1 and 2 at newly obtained addresses, and after conferral with Plaintiff’s counsel, undersigned…
…NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, The Original Parties jointly write to seek clarification of the following parts of the Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions, ECF No. 1044: at a time…
…in the above-captioned matter. 2. Pursuant to this Court’s August 26, 2020, order directing the Original Parties to serve Non-Party Notices on all remaining Non-Parties, ECF No. 1107, the Original Parties agreed to split responsibility for…
…as news, as they are defamatory.” Churcher is the sole source of information regarding the original story told by Plaintiff, and was the author of the first articles publishing Plaintiff’s claims. She was actively and personally involved in changing…
…is that the Non-Parties will 10 initially file their objection under seal. The Court then, 11 sometimes with information from the Original parties, will 12 prepare a redacted copy of those filings so that those can be 13 docketed…
…TO INTERVENE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 24(B) ..............................11 A. There Is Significant Overlap Between the Subject Matter of the Original Action and This Motion ....................................................12 …
…``If a great network thinks it’s increasing its credibility by hiring a convicted perjurer to tell us the truth, something’s wrong.’’ © 2015 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 Case 1:15…
…requested Excerpts (and who therefore do not intend to object to unsealing) will also be exceedingly helpful to the Original Parties tasked with redacting the names of Non-Parties who have not yet had the opportunity to object to unsealing…
…the updated Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions (DE 1108), any reply in support of an objection to unsealing filed by an Original Party is due “within 7 days of service” of the opposition to such an objection. Id…
…the updated Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions (DE 1108), any reply in support of an objection to unsealing filed by an Original Party is due “within 7 days of service” of the opposition to such an objection. Id…
…privileged document has been identified. Ms. Maxwell’s original search for responsive documents was complete at the time it was conducted in February 2016. The recent forensic imaging and searches have merely confirmed as much. Plaintiff has sent defense counsel…
…motion for reconsideration “shall be served withing fourteen (14) days after the entry of the Court’s determination of the original motion” and “shall” include “a memorandum setting forth concisely the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the Court…
…s discretion under Rule 24(b)(2) is very broad.”). In exercising its discretion, the Court is required by rule to “consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the original parties’ rights.” Fed. R. Civ…
…the situation in which a Non-Party does not object to a document’s unsealing, be changed to provide the Original Party objecting to unsealing (i.e., Defendant) with an automatic right to file a reply brief. But because this…
…1 In deciding Ms. Maxwell’s Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc # 18), this Court agreed with Plaintiff’s original contention, stating “this case involves a single claim against a single defendant, relating to an ongoing series of events in which…
…Non-Party Objection and accompanying memorandum, if any, the Original Parties may file an opposition stating the reasons why any Sealed Item should be unsealed. The opposition shall be served on the objecting Non-Party. The objecting Non-Party may…
Comments