…10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, The Original Parties write in response to the Court’s December 14, 2020, order directing them to confer about a proposed next set of docket entries…
…is that the Non-Parties will 10 initially file their objection under seal. The Court then, 11 sometimes with information from the Original parties, will 12 prepare a redacted copy of those filings so that those can be 13 docketed…
…1055. Neither Doe 1 nor Doe 2 requested Excerpts under the Protocol, the Original Parties submitted their own briefs, and the Court ruled that the first five motions, including portions of those documents mentioning Doe 1 or Doe 2, should…
…requested Excerpts (and who therefore do not intend to object to unsealing) will also be exceedingly helpful to the Original Parties tasked with redacting the names of Non-Parties who have not yet had the opportunity to object to unsealing…
…publicly disclose or file on the public docket the names or identifying information of non-party Does (except for Mr. Dershowitz) in materials originally 1 Unless otherwise noted, Docket Entries refer to the Dershowitz case. Case 1:15-cv…
…the situation in which a Non-Party does not object to a document’s unsealing, be changed to provide the Original Party objecting to unsealing (i.e., Defendant) with an automatic right to file a reply brief. But because this…
…1 In deciding Ms. Maxwell’s Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc # 18), this Court agreed with Plaintiff’s original contention, stating “this case involves a single claim against a single defendant, relating to an ongoing series of events in which…
…time to object to the unsealing of the Doe 1 and 2 materials at issue in this second round. The Original Parties and the Court received a request for excerpts for sealed materials from Does 1 and 2 on Friday…
…as well as documents relevant to those motions. 2. Notification of Non-Parties: The Original Parties shall send the Non-Party Notice to all remaining Non-Parties. 3. Response Times: Paragraphs 2(d) and 2(e) of the Protocol will …
…1228). Doe’s letters propose that non-party objections to unsealing that were not opposed by either of the original parties – because the parties relied on an order by this Court telling them not to respond – should be “summarily sustained…
…1108 ¶ 2f (providing that “the Original Parties shall have 7 days from the date on which the Non-Party’s time to object expires to submit an objection to unsealing and an accompanying memorandum. Any opposition to such an objection…
…if any, the Original Parties may file an opposition stating the reasons why any Sealed Item should be unsealed.” DE 1108, at 3. That same paragraph further provides the “objecting Non-Party may file a reply in support of its…
…a formal objection to unsealing. The original parties to this action may file their own objection to unsealing no later than (1) 7 days after service of any formal objection by Does 1 and 2, as provided by Paragraph 2…
…redacted name. Further, the Miami Herald correctly notes that the Protocol permits the Court’s staff (with the assistance of the original parties) to redact the non-party submissions and publicly file them via ECF. See DE 1225, at 2…
…filed. Non-Party List. This list is intended to capture all non-parties who should be notified if they are identifiably referenced in the sealed materials. The original parties, non-party J.Doe and intervenors Ms. Brown and the Miami…