…multiple times to propose five motions pertaining to J. Doe 1 and J. Doe 2, as identified on the sealed Non-Party List, with which the Court may begin administering the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions, Dkt. 1044…
…On June 20, 2016, this Court Ordered Defendant to sit for a second deposition because her refusal to answer questions posed in her first Deposition (June 20, 2016 Sealed Order, filed in redacted version at D.E. 264-1). Yet,…
…On June 20, 2016, this Court Ordered Defendant to sit for a second deposition because her refusal to answer questions posed in her first Deposition (June 20, 2016 Sealed Order, filed in redacted version at D.E. 264-1). Yet,…
…On June 20, 2016, this Court Ordered Defendant to sit for a second deposition because her refusal to answer questions posed - in her first Deposition (June 20, 2016 Sealed Order, filed in redacted version at D.E. 264-1). Yet,…
…On June 20, 2016, this Court Ordered Defendant to sit for a second deposition because her refusal to answer questions posed in her first Deposition (June 20, 2016 Sealed Order, filed in redacted version at D.E. 264-1). Yet,…
…3560022 ~1gn Mc aw1ey, t,sq. s111ccawlevPbstllp.com January 30, 2017 …
…the July 3, 2019 Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit directed this Court to perform a “particularized review” of materials previously filed under seal in this matter (the “Sealed Materials”) to determine whether they…
…unsealing order to remain consistent with its treatment of other Non-Party Does who continue to experience trauma as a result of the events that are the subject of this litigation by “keeping [her] name sealed in excerpts that discuss …
…marked confidential, sealed, 22 and retained by the Special Master. 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 5 of 223 4 1 Dep…
…unsealing order to remain consistent with its treatment of other Non-Party Does who continue to experience trauma as a result of the events that are the subject of this litigation by “keeping [her] name sealed in excerpts that discuss …
…187 21 REPORTER'S NOTE: Exhibit 5 marked confidential, sealed, 22 and retained by the Special Master. 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 4 1 Deposition taken before Deborah A. Harris, 2 …
…have erred on the side of strict confidentiality to avoid any semblance of violating the Court’s Protective Order, I of course do not believe that these materials should remain sealed permanently. In the event the Court grants my application…
…public access to judicial documents in a case of great public interest like this one.1 This is especially so when many of the facts underlying this case, and much of the information that non-parties seek to keep sealed…
…That's a different issue. 14 There is a third category that I think I might propose 15 to your Honor. We were the only party to submit a request to 16 keep documents sealed and we, in our chart…
…out of any response Defendant provides within the parameters of the Court’s June 20, 2016 Sealed Order. As recounted more fully in the moving brief, the questions Defendant refused to answer fall squarely within this Court’s earlier order…
…GIUFFRE001410; GIUFFRE001411; GIUFFRE00; etc.); See McCawley Dec. at Sealed Composite Exhibit 4 Figueroa Dep. Tr. at page 200:5-12 (Defendant called him to bring girls and he brought 16 and 17 year olds). 11 See, e.g., McCawley Dec…
…These files demonstrate the magnitude of Epstein's criminal conduct and the unlikelihood that Dershowitz was ignorant of his confidant and close friend's criminal behavior. Dershowitz complains that some of the documents are sealed or otherwise unavailable to him…
…to support a colorable argument (or on the basis of misrepresented or false facts or law) will be met with sanctions. June 20, 2016, Sealed Order at 13-14. The Defendant ignored this Order, and her motion should - be denied. …
…wasn't on the island. 7 And so in your Honor's order in 264-1, which is one of 8 the sealed orders, you did not allow us to depose him because 9 you said it was irrelevant. 10 …
…Decl. at Exhibit 2, June 20, 2016 Sealed Order at p. 10 (Emphasis added). As articulated in the moving brief, Defendant refused to answer four categories of questions that were directly within the ambit of this Court’s Order. First…
Comments