…10 November 2015 18:16 To: Gmax; Philip Barden Subject: Fwd: Inquiry from The New York Times Hi Ghislaine and Philip Please advise how you wish to respond... Best Ross ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Meier, Barry Jane Doe 2 Date: Tuesday…
…10 November 2015 18:16 To: Gmax; Philip Barden Subject: Fwd: Inquiry from The New York Times Hi Ghislaine and Philip Please advise how you wish to respond... Best Ross ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Meier, Barry Jane Doe 2 Date: Tuesday…
…156-6 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 3 Pre‐Existing Factual Documents Log Email Sent Privilege Page Doc ID Date Email From …
…action pertaining to JE Every story in the press innuendo and comment has been taken from civ depositions against JE, which were settled many years ago. None of the depositions were ever subject to cross examination, not one. any I …
…following privileges are asserted pursuant to British law, Colorado law and NY law. Log ID DATE DOC. BATES FROM TO CC RELATIONSHIP SUBJECT PRIVILEGE TYPE # …
…Order, DE 1097 (as amended by DE 1104), we write regarding the proposed disclosure of confidential Maxwell materials requested by Alan Dershowitz – his fourth attempt to acquire Maxwell materials subject to the Protective Order, DE 62 (the “Protective Order”). Second…
…to Unseal and redact only names and identifying information of Non- Compel Production of Parties who have objected to unsealing or whose time to object to Documents Subject unsealing has not yet expired. to Improper Objection 344 …
… Paul Cassell ([email protected]); "[email protected]" ([email protected]); Jeff Pagliuca Subject: Notice of Subpoena Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:10:02 AM Attachments: 2016-05-16 Notice of Service & Subpoena for Deposition to Laura, Please…
…17, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Mr. Dershowitz’s Request for Discovery Subject to Protective Order Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ…
…following privileges are asserted pursuant to British law, Colorado law and NY law. Log ID DATE DOC. BATES FROM TO CC RELATIONSHIP SUBJECT PRIVILEGE TYPE # …
… Mary E. Pirrotta; [email protected] Subject: Edward & Cassell v. Dershowitz CACE 15-000072 (05) Good morning, I am advising of Judge Lynch's rulings on the above referenced case. His rulings are as follows: Non Party's motion to…
…2016 10:33 PM To: Meredith Schultz Subject: Virginia Giuffre Dear Sir/Madam Ms Judith A Lightfoot has requested I forward this to you: This will serve to advise all records of a psychological nature have been presented . Judith A…
…L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ________________________________/ DECLARATION OF SIGRID S. McCAWLEY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO IMPROPER CLAIM OF…
…following privileges are asserted pursuant to British law, Colorado law and NY law. Log ID DATE DOC. BATES FROM TO CC RELATIONSHIP SUBJECT PRIVILEGE TYPE # …
…Pleadings and Related Orders (“Case Management”) 9. Evidence and Motions filed for an Improper Purpose or Subject to a Motion to Strike or Exclude (“Improper Purpose”) Date Filed DE Category Docket Text DECLARATION of Sigrid S.…
…Protective Order and punish its violation. Ms. Maxwell’s two deposition transcripts were designated “Confidential” and subject to the protection of the Protective Order. Both transcripts ended up in the hands of the government, which used them to bring an…
…following privileges are asserted pursuant to British law, Colorado law and NY law. Log ID DATE DOC. BATES FROM TO CC RELATIONSHIP SUBJECT PRIVILEGE TYPE # …
…15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X Notice of Submission of Declaration in Support of Defendant’s In Camera Submission in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the Production of Documents Subject to Improper Claim of Privilege 1…
…Maxwell’s Personal and Financial Information ARE Irrelevant to This Action .......... 3 II. Personal (and business) Financial Information Not Subject to Pre-Trial Discovery where it Relates Solely to Claim for Punitive Damages .................................................................... 5 A. Discovery…
…Maxwell’s Personal and Financial Information ARE Irrelevant to This Action .......... 3 II. Personal (and business) Financial Information Not Subject to Pre-Trial Discovery where it Relates Solely to Claim for Punitive Damages .................................................................... 5 A. Discovery…
Comments