…Both Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell have asked for this Court’s permission to file a List of Decided Motions under seal because the list contains information that is currently subject to the Sealing Order in this case…
…Both Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell have asked for this Court’s permission to file a List of Decided Motions under seal because the list contains information that is currently subject to the Sealing Order in this case…
…Maxwell’s Personal and Financial Information ARE Irrelevant to This Action .......... 3 II. Personal (and business) Financial Information Not Subject to Pre-Trial Discovery where it Relates Solely to Claim for Punitive Damages .................................................................... 5 A. Discovery…
…Maxwell’s Personal and Financial Information ARE Irrelevant to This Action .......... 3 II. Personal (and business) Financial Information Not Subject to Pre-Trial Discovery where it Relates Solely to Claim for Punitive Damages .................................................................... 5 A. Discovery…
…sexually abused. At several points during her recent deposition, Ms. Maxwell refused to answer Ms. Giuffre’s questions about Epstein, but instead told her she should go ask Epstein about the subject. See, e.g., Tr. of Depo. of Defendant…
…5. Ms. Maxwell objects to the Requests to the extent they seek information which is not relevant to the subject matter of the litigation and/or is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 6. Ms…
…subpoena demonstrates that Defendant is not even seeking documents relevant to the matter before this Court, and is instead attempting to obtain backdoor discovery for other actions. Ms. Ransome’s responses are subject to the following qualifications, explanations, and objections…
…subpoena demonstrates that Defendant is not even seeking documents relevant to the matter before this Court, and is instead attempting to obtain backdoor discovery for other actions. Ms. Ransome’s responses are subject to the following qualifications, explanations, and objections…
…non- parties is no longer appropriate. Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Parties be permitted to review and publish the sealed materials subject to redactions to protect the names and personally identifiable information of victims only, which would greatly expedite the…
…subpoena demonstrates that Defendant is not even seeking documents relevant to the matter before this Court, and is instead attempting to obtain backdoor discovery for other actions. Ms. Ransome’s responses are subject to the following qualifications, explanations, and objections…
…sexually abused. At several points during her recent deposition, Ms. Maxwell refused to answer Ms. Giuffre’s questions about Epstein, but instead told her she should go ask Epstein about the subject. See, e.g., Tr. of Depo. of Defendant…
…5. Ms. Maxwell objects to the Requests to the extent they seek information which is not relevant to the subject matter of the litigation and/or is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 6. Ms…
…5. Ms. Maxwell objects to the Requests to the extent they seek information which is not relevant to the subject matter of the litigation and/or is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 6. Ms…
…the Miami Herald respectfully requests that the Court enter an order identifying each of these documents as judicial documents subject to both the First Amendment right of access and the common law right of access.2 Given the presumption of…
…Therefore, when referring to documents “to identify” means to give, to the extent known, the (i) type of documents, (ii) general subject matter; (iii) date of the documents; and (iv) author(s), addressee(s) and recipient(s). In the alternative…
…Defendant) PTF DEF PTF DEF PTF DEF CITIZEN OF THIS STATE [ )1 [)(]I 1 CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF A f ]3I ]3 INCORPORATED and PRINCIPAL PLACE [ )5 I J 5,…
Comments