…Preska Counsel may proceed with filing the relevant District Court Judge documents to the public docket, subject to the United States District Court previously-ordered redactions. SO ORDERED. Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street …
…279, 315, 320, and 335 (ECF No. 1167-2), as attachments hereto. Material subject to this Court’s January 26, 2021, order remains redacted. ECF No. 1193. Sincerely, /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq.…
…to Unseal and redact only names and identifying information of Non- Compel Production of Parties who have objected to unsealing or whose time to object to Documents Subject unsealing has not yet expired. to Improper Objection 344 …
…279, 315, 320, and 335 (ECF No. 1167-2), as attachments hereto. Material subject to this Court’s January 26, 2021, order remains redacted. ECF No. 1193. Sincerely, /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq.…
…279, 315, 320, and 335 (ECF No. 1167-2), as attachments hereto. Material subject to this Court’s January 26, 2021, order remains redacted. ECF No. 1193. Sincerely, /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq.…
…and, since that time, the Court has received reports that information that was subject to continued sealing was inadvertently disclosed. The Court writes now to clarify the unsealing process intended by its December 18 Order. First, the Court reiterates its…
…279, 315, 320, and 335 (ECF No. 1167-2), as attachments hereto. Material subject to this Court’s January 26, 2021, order remains redacted. ECF No. 1193. Sincerely, /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq.…
…Both Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell have asked for this Court’s permission to file a List of Decided Motions under seal because the list contains information that is currently subject to the Sealing Order in this case…
…deposition for any purpose permissible under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Federal Rules of Evidence. These designations are made subject to Ms. Maxwell’s previously lodged objections to the various designations made by the Plaintiff and subject to…
…and abuse while she was a minor child. Defendant Maxwell not only facilitated that sexual abuse but, most recently, wrongfully subjected Giuffre to public ridicule, contempt and disgrace by, among other things, calling Giuffre a liar in published statements with…
…be sealed. The Non-Parties shall include but are not limited to: (a) persons who produced or answered discovery based upon the representation or understanding that the discovery would be subject to the Protective Order previously issued in this action;…
…were retained to represent her in this matter. The privacy interests at stake in this litigation are the subject of considerable complexity that Doe 171’s undersigned counsel are still attempting to digest. Although Doe 171’s undersigned counsel still…
…be sealed. The Non-Parties shall include but are not limited to: (a) persons who produced or answered discovery based upon the representation or understanding that the discovery would be subject to the Protective Order previously issued in this action;…
…1). Generally, they allege that the respondent Government violated their rights under the CVRA by failing to consult with them before negotiating a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, who subjected them to various sexual crimes while they were minors. …
…be sealed. The Non-Parties shall include but are not limited to: (a) persons who produced or answered discovery based upon the representation or understanding that the discovery would be subject to the Protective Order previously issued in this action;…
…the Court explicitly ruled, “[A]ll documents, materials, and information subject to the Protective Order must be returned to the party who designated its confidentiality as of the date this action was dismissed.” Sealed Op., at 3 (Nov. 14, 2017) …
…parties’ failure to properly make redactions of the publicly released materials. In a series of orders, the Court has authorized the parties to release certain Sealed Materials to the public subject to required redactions. However, the parties’ redactions are not…
…be sealed. The Non-Parties shall include but are not limited to: (a) persons who produced or answered discovery based upon the representation or understanding that the discovery would be subject to the Protective Order previously issued in this action;…
…1). Generally, they allege that the respondent Government violated their rights under the CVRA by failing to consult with them before negotiating a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, who subjected them to various sexual crimes while they were minors. …
…1). Generally, they allege that the respondent Government violated their rights under the CVRA by failing to consult with them before negotiating a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, who subjected them to various sexual crimes while they were minors. …
Comments