gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.156.1.pdf PDF
…15-cv-07433-LAP Document 156-1 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 26 Log Privilege Doc ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To …
…15-cv-07433-LAP Document 156-1 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 26 Log Privilege Doc ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To …
…15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1326-3 Filed 01/04/24 Page 2 of 27 Log Privilege Doc ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To …
…15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-15 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 27 Log Privilege Doc ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To …
…Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 9 Pottinger Documents Log Email Sent Privilege Page Doc ID Date Email From …
…15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-15 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 27 Log Privilege Doc ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To …
…Preska Counsel may proceed with filing the relevant District Court Judge documents to the public docket, subject to the United States District Court previously-ordered redactions. SO ORDERED. Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street …
…1 Filed 05/26/16 Page 2 of 6 Log Privilege Doc ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To …
…2 of 6 Unidentified "Professionals" Log Email Sent Privilege Page Doc ID Date Email From …
…LAP Document 156-2 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 4 Media Advice Communications Log Email Sent Privilege Page Doc ID Date Email Fr…
…Document 156-8 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 5 VRS Communications Log Email Sent Privilege Page Doc ID Date Email Fr…
…156-6 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 3 Pre‐Existing Factual Documents Log Email Sent Privilege Page Doc ID Date Email From …
…to Unseal and redact only names and identifying information of Non- Compel Production of Parties who have objected to unsealing or whose time to object to Documents Subject unsealing has not yet expired. to Improper Objection 344 …
…and, since that time, the Court has received reports that information that was subject to continued sealing was inadvertently disclosed. The Court writes now to clarify the unsealing process intended by its December 18 Order. First, the Court reiterates its…
…Pleadings and Related Orders (“Case Management”) 9. Evidence and Motions filed for an Improper Purpose or Subject to a Motion to Strike or Exclude (“Improper Purpose”) Date Filed DE Category Docket Text DECLARATION of Sigrid S.…
…2016, Opinion with agreed upon redactions. The Court ordered as follows: This matter being subject to a Protective Order, the parties are directed to meet and confer regarding redactions to this Opinion consistent with that Order. The parties are further…
…Plaintiff contends that Defendant’s approach contravenes the Court’s ruling, which (as did the Second Circuit) unsealed the documents subject to limited redactions. Given the parties’ disagreement, Plaintiff will send her proposed redactions to Chambers (copying defense counsel) via…
…through counsel. These Non-Parties were guaranteed, by Plaintiff’s counsel, that their testimony would remain confidential subject to the Protective Order. Nothing further should be required. Apart from the Protocol, there are practical problems with Plaintiff’s position. First…
…be sealed. The Non-Parties shall include but are not limited to: (a) persons who produced or answered discovery based upon the representation or understanding that the discovery would be subject to the Protective Order previously issued in this action;…
…Giuffre’s proposed redactions to the sealed materials. The Court does so, however, subject to several caveats. Ms. Maxwell contends that Ms. Giuffre’s “proposed redactions contain errors which reveal the names of [n]onparties, including alleged victims.” (Id.) Ms…
…(Doc. 1044).1 Nonparties on the list include (a) persons who produced or answered discovery based on the understanding that such discovery would be subject to the Protective Order, (b) persons who are identified as allegedly having engaged in sex…
Comments