…15-cv-07433-LAP GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly…
…cv-07433-LAP GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered…
…cv-07433-LAP GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered…
…15-cv-07433-LAP GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly…
… No. 15-cv-07433-LAP GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions (Updated August 27, 2020) The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge…
…privacy, and (3) requesting excerpts of sealed materials that mention them for their review (the “September 25 Email”). The parties dispute the procedural import of the September 25 Email under the Protocol governing the unsealing of documents in this action…
…letters to the Court dated November 10, 2020 (DE 1143) and November 16, 2020 (DE 1153) concerning various issues surrounding the unsealing protocol. In the final paragraph of her November 10, 2020 correspondence, Plaintiff asserts her belief that the Court…
…PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has considered the parties’ various submissions regarding the review protocol (“the Protocol”) to be utilized by the Court in its individualized review of the sealed materials at issue in this litigation. (See…
…to the Court’s July 1, 2021, direction that the Parties meet and confer and propose to the Court ways to streamline the present unsealing process, as detailed in the Unsealing Protocol. ECF No. 1108. The Parties met and conferred…
…9010 Attorneys for Intervenors Julie Brown and Miami Herald Media Company Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1067 Filed 06/24/20 Page 2 of 10 Pursuant to this Court’s Order and protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions…
…30, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Defendant Maxwell’s Letter Submitting Materials Relating to Protocol and Non-Party Notice Giuffre v. Maxwell, No…
…2020 (Doc. 1034) at 3, attached please find Ms. Maxwell’s proposed changes to the Court’s proposed revisions to the Protocol, Notice to Non-Parties, the Non-Party Request for Excerpts, and the Non-Party Form Objection. Counsel conferred…
…15-cv-07433-LAP GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions (Updated August October 27__, 20202021) The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along wi…
…10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1057 Filed 06/10/20 Page 2 of 17 Pursuant to this Court’s Order and p…
…of August 3, 2020 (Doc. 1069), the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions (Doc. 1044) (“Protocol”), and to raise with the Court the legal effect of new information that came to the attention of counsel for Ms. Maxwell on…
…John Doe, in response to the letters filed by the parties in the above-referenced case offering competing proposals for streamlining the unsealing process established by the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions. See DE 1224. We write to…
…the Non-Party List, and Ms. Maxwell’s proposed Order and Protocol. List of Decided Motions. Plaintiff’s only objection to the use of Doc.1007-1 as the List of Decided Motions is her position that two motions, Docs…
…Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: INTERVENORS’ LETTER IN RESPONSE TO DOE’S LETTERS REGARDING THE UNSEALING PROTOCOL (DKT. NOS. 1226…
…NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, The Original Parties jointly write to seek clarification of the following parts of the Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions, ECF No. 1044: at a time…
…Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: INTERVENORS’ LETTER IN RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S ORDER AMENDING THE UNSEALING PROTOCOL, DKT. 1230…