…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…Non-Party Virginia Robert's Motion for Sanctions (the "Motion to Strike"). The Court heard argument of counsel, reviewed the Court file and is otherwise fully advised. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion to Strike is granted…
…29 and 30, constitute a “motion” for purposes of this Order and Protocol The following procedure shall be used for each set of motions reviewed by the Court: a. The Court will notify the parties via minute order (“Notification”) of…