…write in response to the Court’s December 14, 2020, order directing them to confer about a proposed next set of docket entries to be reviewed for unsealing. ECF No. 1179. The Original Parties have conferred and discussed ways in…
…15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell’s letter dated September 30, 2020, and Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre’s letter dated…
…a dozen boxes of material, presumably all of the deposition transcripts,” but then speculates that the transcripts were “unread” and asserts that “[t]he parties do not know whether Judge Sweet ever reviewed any of the deposition designations, counter-designations…
…nos. 468, 567) were actually decided by Judge Sweet and thus disagreed as to whether they should be included on the list of materials to be reviewed by the Court. After reviewing those items, the Court determines that they were…
…Giuffre v. Dershowitz, Case No.: 19-cv-03377-LAP Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-LAP Your Honor: Professor Dershowitz has reviewed the submission made by non-party John Doe, ECF No. 1182 in Giuffre v. Maxwell, in…
…against- MEMORANDUM & ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell’s letter requesting reconsideration of the Court’s July 23, 2020, decision to uns…
…Schiller & Flexner LLP ' s Motion to Quash Subpoena Or For Protective Order and Jane Doe No. J's Motion to Quash Subpoena Or For Protective Order. Having reviewed the record and being otherwise fully advised, the Court hereby Orders: 1…
…DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Co…
…LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed and approved the parties’ joint proposed redacted Decided Motions List that was submitted to the Court on April 3, 2020. (See dkt…
…Apple, Inc. for all of the records associated with her “iCloud” email account. Counsel for Ms. Giuffre has already reviewed Ms. Giuffre’s account for responsive records. Defendant is not entitled to all emails that Ms. Giuffre may have ever…
…in 19-cv-3377) “give[s] plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and defendant Alan Dershowitz the unfettered bilateral authority to publicly file presently sealed documents from Giuffre v. Maxwell.” The Court also has reviewed the letter responses from Professor Dershowitz and Ms…
…the Court more easily to manage and review any objections from Non- Parties. The following procedure shall be used for each set of Sealed Items reviewed by the Court: a. The Court will notify the parties via minute order (“Notification”…
…144), after it came to light that Giuffre’s counsel in Dershowitz possesses and has reviewed confidential and sealed materials from Maxwell, the Court subsequently directed the parties in Dershowitz to confer regarding “reasonable accommodation concerning Mr. Dershowitz’s requests…
…response, etc., occupied a separate docket number. We estimate we reviewed more than 600 docketed materials, totaling more than 8,600 pages. This project could not be accomplished by scanning or speed-reading. For redacted materials, there were many documents…
…document basis. Many of these documents have already been reviewed during the review for Does 1 and 2. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1224 Filed 07/28/21 Page 2 of 6 The Honorable Loretta A. Preska…
…be placed near the Bates number. 8. Designation of a document as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall constitute a representation that such document has been reviewed by an attorney for the designating party, that there is a valid and good faith basis…
…allow the Court more easily to manage and review any objections from Non- Parties. The following procedure shall be used for each set of Sealed Items reviewed by the Court: a. The Court will notify the parties via minute order…
…the January 16 status conference (Tr. 11-12), Ms. Menninger has reviewed the sealed Doc.1007-1 and determined that it contains confidential information, specifically non-party’s names. As suggested by the Court, as soon as the identifiers are…
…the Court more easily to manage and review any objections from Non- Parties. The following procedure shall be used for each set of Sealed Items reviewed by the Court: a. The Court will notify the parties via minute order (“Notification”…
…2016. It states: “Designation of a document as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall constitute a representation that such document has been reviewed by an attorney for the designating party, that there is a valid and good 4 Case 1:15-cv…