gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1325.12.pdf PDF
…4 patient packet and showed up for a new patient 5 appointment for a particular reason. I reviewed it. 6 7 Jane Doe 2 8 Q Do you know where that new patient packet 9 is now? 10 A It…
…4 patient packet and showed up for a new patient 5 appointment for a particular reason. I reviewed it. 6 7 Jane Doe 2 8 Q Do you know where that new patient packet 9 is now? 10 A It…
…parties have confirmed that Plaintiff’s deposition has yet to be taken in light of this outstanding discovery dispute. Having reviewed and considered Defendant’s motion to compel [DE 40] and Plaintiff’s opposition [DE 41] the Court is GRANTING…
…RFP No. 1 seeks documents Mr. Pagliuca allegedly ‘reviewed and/or relied upon’ in allegedly making statements stating that Plaintiff previously made false accusations of sexual assault.” (Br. at 5). (Emphasis original). How Defendant purports to distinguish between the actual…
…I've tried 14 to do that in our papers. But listening to opposing counsel 15 I'm concerned maybe she hasn't reviewed the documents we have 16 produced. We have clearly produced all of the media 17 communications…
…attorneys who would be given access to the confidential 15 materials were attorneys actively working on the Maxwell case. 16 I was troubled, when I reviewed some of the discovery responses 17 that were attached to Mr. Cooper's letter…
…talked about this 16 process in the beginning it was not going to be piecemeal, 17 meaning things that were negative to Virginia only get released 18 when the things to Maxwell don't get reviewed or released 19 timely…
…to each document for ease of reference. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT On October 19, 2020, the Second Circuit affirmed this Court’s order unsealing the deposition materials included within the first set of motions the Court reviewed. Giuffre v. Maxwell, 827 F…
…regarding sex abuse, sexual trafficking and acting as his “madam” to the stars. As proof, one need look no further than emails already reviewed by this Court. In an email sent by Epstein to Ms. Maxwell on January 25, 2015…
…far as Apple, my understanding 11 about Apple is that with respect to that, that material has 12 been reviewed by counsel and everything has been turned over 13 that's appropriate. 14 MS. SCHULTZ: That is correct, your Honor…
…2, 2009). First, as reviewed in detail on a witness-by-witness basis above, the discovery sought is not duplicative. The proposed deponents include the individual who assisted in making the defamatory statement, women Defendant Maxwell hired to recruit girls…
…26, 2020). This is not a hypothetical concern; in her objections relating to the first round of documents reviewed pursuant to the protocol, Maxwell identified numerous documents that she contends were filed (by Giuffre) for an improper purpose. See Maxwell…
…2, 2009). First, as reviewed in detail on a witness-by-witness basis above, the discove1y sought is not duplicative. The proposed deponents include the individual who assisted in making the defainatory statement, women Defendant Maxwell hired to recrnit girls…
…and I signed for it, and I reviewed it at that time.” Reason for change: Clarification of answer Page 191 Line 5 Chansie to: “Why would l do — no. I did collect documents and gave them to my lawyers in…
…2, 2009). First, as reviewed in detail on a witness-by-witness basis above, the discovery sought is not duplicative. The proposed deponents include the individual who assisted in making the defamatory statement, women Defendant Maxwell hired to recruit girls…
…She says she refused this > request.· Regarding further detail of the interview which I have reviewed I would like to add one further point to underscore the lack of probity in Ms Roberts claims At no point in Ms…
…any formal training in providing massages. I showed a photo line up in which Nada Marcinkova was placed in position six. She reviewed the six photographs and immediately identified Nada Marcinkova as the person with whom she had intercourse. Additionally…
…2, 2009). First, as reviewed in detail on a witness-by-witness basis above, the discove1y sought is not duplicative. The proposed deponents include the individual who assisted in making the defamatory statement, women Defendant Maxwell hired to recrnit girls…
…2, 2009). First, as reviewed in detail on a witness-by-witness basis above, the discove1y sought is not duplicative. The proposed deponents include the individual who assisted in making the defamato1y statement, women Defendant Maxwell hired to recrnit girls…
… There simply is no legal basis for this Court to find that the documents Dershowitz seeks qualify as “judicial documents.” First, it is not clear that this Court has even reviewed or considered them, and if it has not…
…discovery motion, seeking the same documents Ms. Giuffre previously produced to Defendant. If they had reviewed 1 As the Court knows, Maxwell’s deposition has been scheduled 4 times and Ms. Giuffre even took the extraordinary measure of providing Defendant…