…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…Preska, Plaintiff writes pursuant to the Court’s August 3, 2020 order directing the parties to confer and report suggestions for streamlining the unsealing process and a proposed next set of docket entries to be reviewed for potential unsealing. Dkt…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…parties have confirmed that Plaintiff’s deposition has yet to be taken in light of this outstanding discovery dispute. Having reviewed and considered Defendant’s motion to compel [DE 40] and Plaintiff’s opposition [DE 41] the Court is GRANTING…
…allow the Court more easily to manage and review any objections from Non- Parties. The following procedure shall be used for each set of Sealed Items reviewed by the Court: a. The Court will notify the parties via minute order…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Preska, J.) individually reviewed and unsealed voluminous Case: Case:24-182, 24-182,01/08/2026, 07/23/2025,DktEntry: DktEntry:102.1, …
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…R. Civ. P. 53(f) the Special Master’s ruling on these questions will be reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard. We propose that each side share in the cost of the special master equally, pursuant to Fed. R…
…2009). First, as reviewed in detail on a witness-by-witness basis above, the discovery sought is not duplicative. 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 203 Filed 06/13/16 Page 7 of 15 Second, if Ms…