…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Co…
…Apple, Inc. for all of the records associated with her “iCloud” email account. Counsel for Ms. Giuffre has already reviewed Ms. Giuffre’s account for responsive records. Defendant is not entitled to all emails that Ms. Giuffre may have ever…
…The objections and responses to the RFPs are proper. ................................................ 1 A. RFP No. 1: Documents defense counsel “reviewed and/or relied upon” in a phone call with Plaintiff’s counsel. ...................................................................................... 1 B. RFP N…
… Thank you, lawyers. 19 In talking about the phases through which the review 20 will proceed, first, the parties' briefed and the Court 21 reviewed the documents associated with the 16 nonparty 22 objectors; and, second, the parties briefed and…
…Whereas Plaintiff’s proposed redactions adhered to each of the Court’s prior orders (and were reviewed and approved by the Court previously), Maxwell repeated her assertion that large portions of these materials (including sections of Maxwell’s deposition transcript…
…for Ms. Maxwell received Plaintiff’s proposed redactions. Counsel reviewed the proposed redactions to Ms. Maxwell’s 465-page deposition transcript and conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel regarding her proposed redactions during a telephone conference at 1 p.m. today…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…be placed near the Bates number. 8. Designation of a document as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall constitute a representation that such document has been reviewed by an attorney for the designating party, that there is a valid and good faith basis…
…the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Preska, J.) individually reviewed and unsealed voluminous Case: Case:24-182, 24-182,01/08/2026, 07/23/2025,DktEntry: DktEntry:102.1, …
…when you 7 met Jeffrey Epstein? 8 A. Sixteen or 17. 9 Q. Okay. And have you reviewed -- 10 A. I may have been 15. I don't recall. I 11 apologize. 12 Q. If you told the police officer…
…2 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I actually believe that 3 these emails were some that your Honor had reviewed because we 4 had asserted a joint defense agreement privilege, and your 5 Honor reviewed these emails, and they were produced…
…2d Cir. 2019), the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Preska, J.) individually reviewed and unsealed voluminous CERTIFIED COPY ISSUED ON 07/23/2025 Case: 24-182, 07/23/2025, DktEntry: 95.1, Page…
…I've tried 14 to do that in our papers. But listening to opposing counsel 15 I'm concerned maybe she hasn't reviewed the documents we have 16 produced. We have clearly produced all of the media 17 communications…
…Ms. Giuffre is withholding documents based on her objections. 2. All Documents reviewed or relied upon in answering Interrogatory Nos. 1-14 above. Response to Request No. 2 Ms. Giuffre objects to this request in that defendant’s interrogatories violate…
…regarding sex abuse, sexual trafficking and acting as his “madam” to the stars. As proof, one need look no further than emails already reviewed by this Court. In an email sent by Epstein to Ms. Maxwell on January 25, 2015…
…the same discovery materials will likely have to be reviewed and re-produced, needlessly causing duplication of effort and extra expense.”). The following is a list of objections or responses based upon the Protective Order in Maxwell which Professor Dershowitz…
…before it was filed in September of 2015, as evidenced by the email communications between Dershowtiz and Defendant the Court reviewed in its in camera review before ordering Defendant to produce them. Yet Dershowitz waited until after discovery closed and…
…order articulated and applied the correct legal framework in its individualized review of the materials to be unsealed. CONCLUSION We have reviewed all of the arguments raised by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell on appeal and find them to be without merit…
…underaged individuals in that directory 16 with their phone numbers. So we reviewed that with him. 17 He has testimony about the fact that the black book 18 was something that was kept in the course of their work. It…