…a dozen boxes of material, presumably all of the deposition transcripts,” but then speculates that the transcripts were “unread” and asserts that “[t]he parties do not know whether Judge Sweet ever reviewed any of the deposition designations, counter-designations…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…supplement to her motion for an adverse inference instruction based on new information, follows. Most notably, Defendant claims to have run search terms and reviewed over 10,000 documents, but, remarkably, claims that not a single document - not one - is…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…4 patient packet and showed up for a new patient 5 appointment for a particular reason. I reviewed it. 6 7 Jane Doe 2 8 Q Do you know where that new patient packet 9 is now? 10 A It…
…parties have confirmed that Plaintiff’s deposition has yet to be taken in light of this outstanding discovery dispute. Having reviewed and considered Defendant’s motion to compel [DE 40] and Plaintiff’s opposition [DE 41] the Court is GRANTING…
…RFP No. 1 seeks documents Mr. Pagliuca allegedly ‘reviewed and/or relied upon’ in allegedly making statements stating that Plaintiff previously made false accusations of sexual assault.” (Br. at 5). (Emphasis original). How Defendant purports to distinguish between the actual…
…conducted, under my supervision, by former senior federal law enforcement officials. We interviewed many witnesses and reviewed thousands of pages of documentary evidence. Our investigation found no evidence to support the accusations of sexual misconduct against Professor Dershowitz. In fact…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…production on February 8, 2016. All documents identified as responsive were reviewed by counsel and either produced or placed on a privilege log. The First Responses were the subject of litigation in March and April 2016. This Court limited the…
…RFP No. 1 seeks documents Mr. Pagliuca allegedly ‘reviewed and/or relied upon’ in allegedly making statements stating that Plaintiff previously made false accusations of sexual assault.” (Br. at 5). (Emphasis original). How Defendant purports to distinguish between the actual…
…claims for the purpose of getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars by the media for publicizing her allegations and identifying well know public figures whose names she has seen documents that she reviewed or other stories she had read. …
… b) Shall be maintained in a safe and secure manner; c) Shall be reviewed and possessed by the Defendant in hard copy solely in the presence of Defense Counsel; d) Shall be possessed in electronic format only by Defense Counsel…
…she had run comprehensive search terms, thoroughly reviewed her records and previously produced all responsive documents in her possession.7 The second factor, that “the party that failed to timely produce the evidence had ‘a culpable state of mind’” is…
…2, 2009). First, as reviewed in detail on a witness-by-witness basis above, the discove1y sought is not duplicative. The proposed deponents include the individual who assisted in making the defainatory statement, women Defendant Maxwell hired to recrnit girls…
…any formal training in providing massages. I showed a photo line up in which Nada Marcinkova was placed in position six. She reviewed the six photographs and immediately identified Nada Marcinkova as the person with whom she had intercourse. Additionally…
…2, 2009). First, as reviewed in detail on a witness-by-witness basis above, the discove1y sought is not duplicative. The proposed deponents include the individual who assisted in making the defamatory statement, women Defendant Maxwell hired to recrnit girls…
…2, 2009). First, as reviewed in detail on a witness-by-witness basis above, the discove1y sought is not duplicative. The proposed deponents include the individual who assisted in making the defamato1y statement, women Defendant Maxwell hired to recrnit girls…
…remember how old you were when you met Jeffrey Epstein? A. Sixteen or 17. Q. Okay. And have you reviewed – A. I may have been 15. I don't recall. I apologize. Q. If you told the police officer 16…