…write in response to the Court’s December 14, 2020, order directing them to confer about a proposed next set of docket entries to be reviewed for unsealing. ECF No. 1179. The Original Parties have conferred and discussed ways in…
…Preska, Plaintiff writes pursuant to the Court’s August 3, 2020 order directing the parties to confer and report suggestions for streamlining the unsealing process and a proposed next set of docket entries to be reviewed for potential unsealing. Dkt…
…nos. 468, 567) were actually decided by Judge Sweet and thus disagreed as to whether they should be included on the list of materials to be reviewed by the Court. After reviewing those items, the Court determines that they were…
…MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed the parties’ proposed redactions that were provided to the Court for in camera review on the evening of October 21, 2020. The Court has approved Ms…
…LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed and approved the parties’ joint proposed redacted Decided Motions List that was submitted to the Court on April 3, 2020. (See dkt…
…Apple, Inc. for all of the records associated with her “iCloud” email account. Counsel for Ms. Giuffre has already reviewed Ms. Giuffre’s account for responsive records. Defendant is not entitled to all emails that Ms. Giuffre may have ever…
…The objections and responses to the RFPs are proper. ................................................ 1 A. RFP No. 1: Documents defense counsel “reviewed and/or relied upon” in a phone call with Plaintiff’s counsel. ...................................................................................... 1 B. RFP N…
…the Court more easily to manage and review any objections from Non- Parties. The following procedure shall be used for each set of Sealed Items reviewed by the Court: a. The Court will notify the parties via minute order (“Notification”…
…response, etc., occupied a separate docket number. We estimate we reviewed more than 600 docketed materials, totaling more than 8,600 pages. This project could not be accomplished by scanning or speed-reading. For redacted materials, there were many documents…
…1079 at 3-4). The Court already reviewed and approved Plaintiff’s proposed redactions for these documents, and Plaintiff has verified that redactions are in place for each of the categories of information identified in the Court’s July 30…
…with documents relating only to certain Does – Does 1 and 2 in the first instance – at a time. The Court has also requested input from the Original Parties as to which docket entries should be reviewed in what order. See…
…Whereas Plaintiff’s proposed redactions adhered to each of the Court’s prior orders (and were reviewed and approved by the Court previously), Maxwell repeated her assertion that large portions of these materials (including sections of Maxwell’s deposition transcript…
…document basis. Many of these documents have already been reviewed during the review for Does 1 and 2. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1224 Filed 07/28/21 Page 2 of 6 The Honorable Loretta A. Preska…
…for Ms. Maxwell received Plaintiff’s proposed redactions. Counsel reviewed the proposed redactions to Ms. Maxwell’s 465-page deposition transcript and conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel regarding her proposed redactions during a telephone conference at 1 p.m. today…
…adopt the proposal submitted by Ms. Giuffre. (See Dkt. 1224.) Reviewing all of the documents referencing objecting Does at once will significantly reduce the number of times a single document is reviewed, redacted (if warranted), and released. This will streamline…
…RFP No. 1 seeks documents Mr. Pagliuca allegedly ‘reviewed and/or relied upon’ in allegedly making statements stating that Plaintiff previously made false accusations of sexual assault.” (Br. at 5). (Emphasis original). How Defendant purports to distinguish between the actual…
…allow the Court more easily to manage and review any objections from Non- Parties. The following procedure shall be used for each set of Sealed Items reviewed by the Court: a. The Court will notify the parties via minute order…
…the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Preska, J.) individually reviewed and unsealed voluminous Case: Case:24-182, 24-182,01/08/2026, 07/23/2025,DktEntry: DktEntry:102.1, …
…the Court more easily to manage and review any objections from Non- Parties. The following procedure shall be used for each set of Sealed Items reviewed by the Court: a. The Court will notify the parties via minute order (“Notification”…
…1079 at 3-4). The Court already reviewed and approved Plaintiff’s proposed redactions for these documents, and Plaintiff has verified that redactions are in place for each of the categories of information identified in the Court’s July 30…